Skip to content

test(pm): assert MCP uncertainty guidance ordering#1223

Open
Q00 wants to merge 1 commit into
warden/issue-1153-pm-uncertainty-guidancefrom
followup/pr-1154-pm-guidance-test
Open

test(pm): assert MCP uncertainty guidance ordering#1223
Q00 wants to merge 1 commit into
warden/issue-1153-pm-uncertainty-guidancefrom
followup/pr-1154-pm-guidance-test

Conversation

@Q00
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@Q00 Q00 commented May 25, 2026

Summary\n\n- Adds direct MCP PM handler coverage for the uncertainty guidance start response.\n- Pins that PM_UNCERTAINTY_GUIDANCE appears before the first returned question.\n\n## Changes\n\n- Adds a focused test in tests/unit/mcp/tools/test_pm_handler.py.\n\n## Notes\n\nFollow-up for the non-blocking test coverage item on #1154.

Add direct MCP PM handler coverage that the start response includes PM_UNCERTAINTY_GUIDANCE before the first question. This closes the non-blocking test coverage follow-up from PR #1154.\n\nServices: shared\nAffected files:\n- tests/unit/mcp/tools/test_pm_handler.py
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ouroboros-agent ouroboros-agent Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review — ouroboros-agent[bot]

Verdict: APPROVE

Metadata

| Field | Value |
|### Recovery Notes
First recoverable review artifact generated from codex analysis log.

---|---|
| PR | #1223 |
| HEAD checked | df520820da64106dfdedc57bacc9aa3fa49cd6a1 |
| Request ID | req_1779704769_16 |
| Review record | d6db4d6c-3b6e-4a40-9b23-de5b6729e900 |

What Improved

  • Adds regression coverage that the MCP PM interview start response presents PM_UNCERTAINTY_GUIDANCE before the first question.

Issue Requirements

Requirement Status
PR body/title requirements N/A
Add/maintain coverage for PM uncertainty guidance ordering in MCP start response Met

Prior Findings Status

No prior ouroboros-agent[bot] review concerns were present in the provided artifact.

Blockers

No in-scope blocking findings remained after policy filtering.

Follow-up Findings

# File:Line Priority Confidence Suggestion
- - - - None.

Non-blocking Suggestions

| - | - | - | None. |

Test Coverage Notes

  • Reviewed /tmp/pr_diff_1223.patch, changed file list, PR body, human comments, inline comments, prior bot reviews, changed test, and affected handler/source contracts.
  • Current HEAD evidence: src/ouroboros/mcp/tools/pm_handler.py:849 builds start text as session banner, then PM_UNCERTAINTY_GUIDANCE, then the question. src/ouroboros/mcp/types.py:345 confirms text_content is the right MCP result surface for this assertion.
  • Could not execute tests locally: python is unavailable, python3 lacks pytest, and uv is unavailable.

Design Notes

This is test-only coverage for an existing MCP response contract. It does not change runtime behavior, persistence, or public handler parameters.

Design / Roadmap Gate

Affected boundary is PMInterviewHandler.handle({"initial_context": ...}) returning MCP text content. The added test uses an injected engine, avoids LLM/network paths, persists via tmp_path, and checks the user-visible ordering that downstream MCP clients receive through MCPToolResult.text_content.

Directional Notes

Maintainer memory emphasized spec-first PM behavior and high-signal review findings. I focused on the PM/MCP boundary and verified the test asserts a real current-HEAD behavior rather than only duplicating implementation detail.

Test Coverage

  • Reviewed /tmp/pr_diff_1223.patch, changed file list, PR body, human comments, inline comments, prior bot reviews, changed test, and affected handler/source contracts.
  • Current HEAD evidence: src/ouroboros/mcp/tools/pm_handler.py:849 builds start text as session banner, then PM_UNCERTAINTY_GUIDANCE, then the question. src/ouroboros/mcp/types.py:345 confirms text_content is the right MCP result surface for this assertion.
  • Could not execute tests locally: python is unavailable, python3 lacks pytest, and uv is unavailable.

Merge Recommendation

Approve. No blocking runtime, contract, or test-quality issue was found in the changed boundary.

Review-Metadata:
verdict: APPROVE
head_sha: df52082
request_id: req_1779704769_16
review_profile: memory-aware-zero-trust-v2
advisory_memory_only: true


Reviewed by ouroboros-agent[bot] via Codex deep analysis

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant