Skip to content

docs(installer): clarify PyPI prerelease lookup#1228

Open
Q00 wants to merge 1 commit into
fix/install-stable-fallbackfrom
followup/pr-1217-installer-comment
Open

docs(installer): clarify PyPI prerelease lookup#1228
Q00 wants to merge 1 commit into
fix/install-stable-fallbackfrom
followup/pr-1217-installer-comment

Conversation

@Q00
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@Q00 Q00 commented May 25, 2026

Summary\n\n- Clarifies the installer prerelease-selection comment from PR #1217.\n- Documents that the current lookup reads PyPI info.version and stays stable-only on lookup or parse failure.\n\n## Changes\n\n- Updates scripts/install.sh comment only.\n\n## Notes\n\nFollow-up for the non-blocking documentation item on #1217.

Tighten the installer comment so it describes the actual PyPI info.version lookup used to decide whether prerelease flags should be enabled. This addresses the non-blocking documentation follow-up from PR #1217 without changing install behavior.\n\nServices: shared\nAffected files:\n- scripts/install.sh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ouroboros-agent ouroboros-agent Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review — ouroboros-agent[bot]

Verdict: APPROVE

Metadata

| Field | Value |
|### Recovery Notes
First recoverable review artifact generated from codex analysis log.

---|---|
| PR | #1228 |
| HEAD checked | 8c0abb4703d5f9b7fe3f9e747b5a3a8513534ce4 |
| Request ID | req_1779704774_21 |
| Review record | e9953f04-d01f-410f-8378-f2a4c98647d4 |

What Improved

  • Clarifies the installer comment to describe PyPI info.version behavior more accurately.

Issue Requirements

Requirement Status
No linked issue requirement captured N/A

Prior Findings Status

No prior bot review concerns were present in /tmp/pr_prior_bot_reviews_1228.md. Human and inline review comment artifacts were empty.

Blockers

No in-scope blocking findings remained after policy filtering.

Follow-up Findings

# File:Line Priority Confidence Suggestion
- - - - None.

Non-blocking Suggestions

| - | - | - | None. |

Test Coverage Notes

  • Reviewed /tmp/pr_diff_1228.patch, /tmp/pr_changed_files_1228.txt, scripts/install.sh, and related installer test references in tests/unit/scripts/test_install_runtime_selection.py.
  • Did not run tests; the PR changes only a shell comment at scripts/install.sh:50 and does not alter executable behavior.

Design Notes

This is a documentation-only comment correction inside the installer. It does not change runtime selection, PyPI lookup behavior, prerelease handling, installation commands, persistence, or setup contracts.

Design / Roadmap Gate

Affected boundary is limited to installer inline documentation. The executable boundary remains unchanged: PRE_FLAG is still derived from curl https://pypi.org/pypi/${PACKAGE_NAME}/json piped into Python reading ['info']['version'], and install paths continue to conditionally pass prerelease flags for uv, pipx, and pip.

Directional Notes

Maintainer memory emphasized avoiding documentation drift. The current change aligns the comment with the existing implementation, which reads PyPI JSON info.version; no blocker is supported by current HEAD evidence.

Test Coverage

  • Reviewed /tmp/pr_diff_1228.patch, /tmp/pr_changed_files_1228.txt, scripts/install.sh, and related installer test references in tests/unit/scripts/test_install_runtime_selection.py.
  • Did not run tests; the PR changes only a shell comment at scripts/install.sh:50 and does not alter executable behavior.

Merge Recommendation

Approve. No blocking or non-blocking findings found for this comment-only clarification.

Review-Metadata:
verdict: APPROVE
head_sha: 8c0abb4
request_id: req_1779704774_21
review_profile: memory-aware-zero-trust-v2
advisory_memory_only: true


Reviewed by ouroboros-agent[bot] via Codex deep analysis

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant