Skip to content

Post-v0.18.0 work plan: estate bump, #107 validation wave, harness alignment, then Phase 2 #113

Description

@mmcky

Tracking issue for the work queued behind today's release. Context: v0.18.0 shipped the forward --github integrity cluster (#108#104, #105, the mechanical halves of #106), criterion-score validation (#110#102), and node24 + @actions/* CJS majors (#111 → most of #89), all smoke-tested live on QuantEcon/test-translation-sync.fa#78. v0, v0.18, and v0.18.0 all point at the release. The items below are ordered; each is independently completable.

1. Bump the estate to v0.18.0

The reviewer resync fallback and all #108 fixes only reach target repos when their pins move — the estate sits at v0.16.1 (two releases behind; 9 pins across 4 repos, catalogue in QuantEcon/project-translation#7). Repos wired to @v0 picked the release up automatically; explicit ref: pins need PRs. While touching each repo's workflows, apply the current v0.17.0+ review-template guards (labeled trigger, concurrency group, permissions) where missing — the same drift #109 documents for the harness.

2. #107 validation wave (prompt change is live but unmeasured)

Re-run translate forward -f on two or three of the 11 hand-fixed intro.zh-cn lectures — long_run_growth, inequality, heavy_tails are the localisation-richest — and diff the output against the hand-fixed branches (the ground truth), counting CJK-bearing code lines per file as #107's follow-up comments prescribe (per-file counts catch wholesale anglicisation; exact-line diff catches the single load-bearing lines like long_run_growth's CSV mapping). Close #107 if preservation holds; either way the comparison seeds the #82 eval harness with its first real metric.

3. #109 harness alignment + the resync-review-label decision

The config work is listed in #109 (labels, current templates, status --write-state bootstrap, config-preserving resets). It contains one design decision to make deliberately: forward resync PRs carry action-translation-sync + resync but not action-translation, so review never auto-triggers on them anywhere. Recommendation: have createForwardPR also apply action-translation — no target-repo workflow edits needed, and it composes with #103's future verdict routing. Small related fix from the smoke: a missing label makes gh pr create fail after the branch is pushed (branch exists, no PR) — fall back to creating the label or opening the PR unlabeled with a warning.

4. Resume the #94 plan: Phase 2, then the #90 remainder

Unchanged from the plan and now unblocked: fence-aware parseSections (the intro_supply_demand phantom SOURCE_AHEAD on 2026-07-18 is a live false positive from this gap), #65 (label)= anchors, the round-trip invariant test, and a real validateMyST — then canonicalizeHeading() and fail-closed fetching from #90. The detection-beats-repair argument is why this outranks patching #90's defects individually.

Cheap wins, any time

Deferred remainders (tracked in their own issues)

Refs: #94 (the standing work plan this extends), #108 #110 #111 #112 (today's PRs), #109 (harness), v0.18.0 release notes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions