tools/highlights.py in action-activity-report reads and writes label names the standard does not define, and carries a note that is now false. From QuantEcon/qeps#3.
| Problem |
Fix |
Dead aliases feature, priority: high, chore, docs |
Remove — they map to enhancement, high-priority, maintenance and documentation, and the migration renames them out of existence |
A comment asserting that infrastructure no longer exists |
Correct it — infrastructure is in the standard, with a description 98 characters long |
discuss and low-priority handling |
Settle it — low-priority is standard, discuss is not, and the report ranks by label |
This emitter differs from the other two: it reads labels in order to rank and surface work, so a dead alias here is silent under-reporting rather than a wrong tag. It is also the emitter whose output people read every week.
This depends on the software widening batch, and is verified by qe gh bots check (QuantEcon/cli#5).
Acceptance
tools/highlights.pyinaction-activity-reportreads and writes label names the standard does not define, and carries a note that is now false. From QuantEcon/qeps#3.feature,priority: high,chore,docsenhancement,high-priority,maintenanceanddocumentation, and the migration renames them out of existenceinfrastructureno longer existsinfrastructureis in the standard, with a description 98 characters longdiscussandlow-priorityhandlinglow-priorityis standard,discussis not, and the report ranks by labelThis emitter differs from the other two: it reads labels in order to rank and surface work, so a dead alias here is silent under-reporting rather than a wrong tag. It is also the emitter whose output people read every week.
This depends on the software widening batch, and is verified by
qe gh bots check(QuantEcon/cli#5).Acceptance
infrastructurenote is correcteddiscussandlow-priorityhandling is decided and recorded here