Part of #147 (close-out: the final task before the PLAN.md close-out).
Why
Gate items update their own documentation lines as they land, and their acceptance criteria say which lines. Nothing checks the docs as a whole against the release that closes the gate. The review of #147 also found documentation lines that describe behaviour the theme does not have and that no gate issue owns. Those lines are collected here. #210, closed on 2026-09-11, recorded where every other part went.
Scope
Review README.md, every page under docs/, and CONTRIBUTING.md against the theme as released at the end of the gate. Start with these lines (the permalinks show them at v2.7.0):
| Line |
Says |
What the theme does |
Study row |
| docs/layout.md L7-L10 |
"A fixed 50px toolbar: the QuantEcon logo and site title, …" |
The toolbar has no site title, and the Home, font-size and GitHub controls go unmentioned |
F019 |
| docs/layout.md L52-L53 |
Below lg (1024px) the outline column is hidden |
The outline appears from 1280px |
F001 |
| docs/dark-mode.md L4-L6 |
"the Sphinx sites' dark ground (#222) and white text" |
This describes book-theme releases before 0.18.0; 13 lecture repositories pin 0.22.0, which has a navy-charcoal palette. The palette choice is a design question on #187 |
F029 |
| docs/configuration.md L51 |
site.title is "the site name in the header and og:site_name" |
The header shows the project title; site.title feeds og:site_name and the page-title suffix |
F006 |
| docs/notebooks.md L7 |
"Long outputs are clipped with a scroll region." |
Nothing limits output height until QuantEcon/mystmd#106 ships |
F069 |
docs/authors.md |
(not mentioned) |
The translator credit joins names in English (", " and " and ") on every edition |
— |
Also:
Acceptance criteria
Context
Part of #147 (close-out: the final task before the PLAN.md close-out).
Why
Gate items update their own documentation lines as they land, and their acceptance criteria say which lines. Nothing checks the docs as a whole against the release that closes the gate. The review of #147 also found documentation lines that describe behaviour the theme does not have and that no gate issue owns. Those lines are collected here. #210, closed on 2026-09-11, recorded where every other part went.
Scope
Review
README.md, every page underdocs/, andCONTRIBUTING.mdagainst the theme as released at the end of the gate. Start with these lines (the permalinks show them at v2.7.0):lg(1024px) the outline column is hidden#222) and white text"site.titleis "the site name in the header andog:site_name"site.titlefeedsog:site_nameand the page-title suffixdocs/authors.mdAlso:
docs/index.md: point its promise that "where a Sphinx option has no counterpart, its page says so" at the table on the migration checklist page (Lecture repos moving off the Sphinx theme have no checklist of what myst.yml and CI must now set #209). Drop the sentence saying the parity work is tracked inPLAN.md, which the PLAN.md close-out issue coordinates.vX.Y.ZURLs should name the release that closes the gate.Acceptance criteria
docs/index.mdpoints its no-counterpart promise at the migration checklist table, and no docs page presentsPLAN.mdas the live record of the parity work.vX.Y.ZURLs name the release that closes the gate.Context