docs: recommend using guppy.load_pytket for pure unitary circuits#130
Open
CalMacCQ wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
docs: recommend using guppy.load_pytket for pure unitary circuits#130CalMacCQ wants to merge 4 commits into
guppy.load_pytket for pure unitary circuits#130CalMacCQ wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
guppy.load_pytket for pure unitary circuits
cqc-alec
requested changes
Jun 10, 2026
cqc-alec
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The phrases "works best when", "best practice" and "should ideally" don't adequately explain why. In what way does it work best; what are the consequences of not following this advice?
Co-authored-by: Alec Edgington <54802828+cqc-alec@users.noreply.github.com>
Collaborator
Author
Thanks, that is a good point. I will add something else explaining why. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #89
I've worded things a bit differently to how Seyon did in the issue. Would appreciate any suggestions to improve clarity.