Rewrite README around all three experiments - #3
Conversation
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot review overview
🟡 Changes recommended
The renamed run section breaks existing application links targeting the previous README anchor.
Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.
Review effort: Lite
Findings: 1
What changed in this PR
Reframes the README around three experiments and clarifies evidence limits, evaluation priorities, and reproduction steps.
Changes:
- Adds unified experiment summaries and results.
- Separates offline evaluation from online business-impact testing.
- Expands local run instructions, security guidance, and roadmap priorities.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Comprehensive documentation rewrite covering all experiments and project roadmap. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
| - No experiment in this repository proves business impact. | ||
|
|
||
| Jev's more interesting role is in ambiguous, runtime-defined decisions where the available options or decision context may change without retraining a classifier. | ||
| ## Run locally |

Summary
Validation