[ADD TOKEN] - WLAND

[hy0567]

WLAND Token

Type: Pre-minted Fungible Token (Glyph FT v2)
GlyphID: 0dbd046d8c5ab8b7631cd896c271c65bf26cc578aa958a620543a4f0a6d7294b:0
Block: 435790 (Mainnet)

Token Info

• Ticker: WLAND
• Max Supply: 1,000,000,000 (fully pre-minted)
• Decimals: 8
• Description: WLAND Token on Radiant Blockchain for the WLAND VPN ecosystem.

Discord Publication

⏳ Discord post in #tokens-listings will be linked here after publication.

---

Note: WLAND is a pre-minted FT (not dMint). Mining-specific fields are marked N/A.

[hy0567]

해당부분에대해서 빠른승인 요청드립니다.

[hy0567]

Apologies for the earlier comment in Korean — let me restate this properly in English.

The token has now been published in the Radiant Discord #tokens-listings channel as required by the submission guide.

Before asking for a review, I'd like to clarify eligibility, because I suspect this PR may not fit the list as-is.

WLAND is a pre-minted Glyph FT v2 (protocol: GLYPH_FT). The entire supply was issued in a single commit/reveal pair, so there is no dMint component:

• GlyphID: 0dbd046d8c5ab8b7631cd896c271c65bf26cc578aa958a620543a4f0a6d7294b:0
• Network: Radiant mainnet, block 435790
• Max supply: 1,000,000,000 (decimals 8), fully pre-minted at reveal
• Reward per mint / Difficulty / Contracts: none — the token has no mint contracts

Looking at the existing entries, every listed token has mining contracts and a matching row in contracts.json ([contractId, count]). WLAND has no contract IDs to provide, so I left contracts.json untouched.

Could a maintainer confirm which of these applies?

1. This list is for mineable (dMint) tokens only → I'll close this PR myself.
2. Pre-minted FTs are acceptable → please advise what to put in contracts.json, since there are no contracts.

I'm happy to close it if it's out of scope — I'd just like a clear answer rather than leaving the PR open indefinitely. Thanks for maintaining this repository.