Skip to content

README: how this extension is built - #56

Merged
RandyNorthrup merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
docs/how-its-built
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

RandyNorthrup merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
docs/how-its-built

Conversation

@RandyNorthrup

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds a How this extension is built section to the README's Development chapter, at the owner's request: the owner sets the plan and approves spend and publishing; Claude Code leads and builds the harder milestones; up to four headless Muse Code (muse exec) builders work on scoped milestones on the Muse Spark contributor model; Grok Build reviews each change before push (read-only, plan mode, one defect class at a time) and Codex reviews the pull request; npm run quality runs on dedicated test machines and again in CI; red drills and live captures back every guard and wire shape. CHANGELOG entry under [Unreleased].

Docs only; prettier check passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The owner, Claude Code as lead engineer, up to four headless Muse Code
builders on the contributor model, Grok Build as the pre-push reviewer
and Codex on the pull request, one defect class at a time, and the gates
on dedicated test machines and CI.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@RandyNorthrup

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-28T20:13:44.761214Z defa4da Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b0b16d2a25

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md Outdated
Comment thread README.md Outdated
Grok Build's review of this PR: CI runs quality:gates (the accessibility
gate, gitleaks and semgrep are their own jobs), the full npm run quality
runs on the test machine, the third-round redesign rule is new, and the
certification records list what was not drilled.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@RandyNorthrup

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0d2889c982

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md Outdated
Codex on PR #56: early milestones used Meta's documented shapes or a fake
server without a live check (M7, M44), and some live checks ran in
workspaces with stored sessions or project rules; say so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@RandyNorthrup

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 37ea35e94f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md Outdated
Codex's third round on PR #56 found more historical claims the records
contradict, so the section is restructured instead of patched: it
describes the current process and points to each milestone's certification
record for what was run, including earlier milestones. It also records
that the test machines run quality:gates, the secret scan and semgrep,
with the accessibility gate run locally for the screens a change touches,
and that Muse drafts are checked and finished by a Claude Code agent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@RandyNorthrup

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c6e3b8ba4e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md Outdated
Comment thread README.md Outdated
Comment thread README.md Outdated
Codex on PR #56: 'since September 2026' covers the whole project, so the
section now dates the process to 2026-09-28 and names earlier records'
differences; it states that AGENTS.md requires npm run quality and how
its parts run while headless Chrome is unreliable on the test machines.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@RandyNorthrup

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e9ebe7aad7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md Outdated
All three test machines (Windows 11 VM, Kubuntu VM, Mac mini) now run the
whole gate, accessibility suite included; the PowerShell lint runs on the
Windows one.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@RandyNorthrup

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: defa4dab97

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@RandyNorthrup
RandyNorthrup merged commit 02f5492 into main Sep 28, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant