README: how this extension is built - #56
Conversation
The owner, Claude Code as lead engineer, up to four headless Muse Code builders on the contributor model, Grok Build as the pre-push reviewer and Codex on the pull request, one defect class at a time, and the gates on dedicated test machines and CI. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@codex review |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b0b16d2a25
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Grok Build's review of this PR: CI runs quality:gates (the accessibility gate, gitleaks and semgrep are their own jobs), the full npm run quality runs on the test machine, the third-round redesign rule is new, and the certification records list what was not drilled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0d2889c982
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Codex on PR #56: early milestones used Meta's documented shapes or a fake server without a live check (M7, M44), and some live checks ran in workspaces with stored sessions or project rules; say so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 37ea35e94f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Codex's third round on PR #56 found more historical claims the records contradict, so the section is restructured instead of patched: it describes the current process and points to each milestone's certification record for what was run, including earlier milestones. It also records that the test machines run quality:gates, the secret scan and semgrep, with the accessibility gate run locally for the screens a change touches, and that Muse drafts are checked and finished by a Claude Code agent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c6e3b8ba4e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Codex on PR #56: 'since September 2026' covers the whole project, so the section now dates the process to 2026-09-28 and names earlier records' differences; it states that AGENTS.md requires npm run quality and how its parts run while headless Chrome is unreliable on the test machines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e9ebe7aad7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
All three test machines (Windows 11 VM, Kubuntu VM, Mac mini) now run the whole gate, accessibility suite included; the PowerShell lint runs on the Windows one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Adds a How this extension is built section to the README's Development chapter, at the owner's request: the owner sets the plan and approves spend and publishing; Claude Code leads and builds the harder milestones; up to four headless Muse Code (
muse exec) builders work on scoped milestones on the Muse Spark contributor model; Grok Build reviews each change before push (read-only, plan mode, one defect class at a time) and Codex reviews the pull request;npm run qualityruns on dedicated test machines and again in CI; red drills and live captures back every guard and wire shape. CHANGELOG entry under [Unreleased].Docs only; prettier check passes.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code