Skip to content

Research Thread

Nick Hamze edited this page Jun 3, 2026 · 1 revision

Research Thread

The critique is worth taking seriously. Research on human-AI co-writing keeps circling the same risk: AI can speed up writing while flattening voice, culture, stance, and meaning. Youish is a practical answer to that risk: keep the speed, reject the flattening, and make the edit prove its work.

Sources

Risk Map

Research Risk Youish Behavior Tested By
The writer stops feeling like the piece is theirs Improve the writing without taking over the stance, protected voice markers, or high-authorship posture. Voice marker fixtures, authorship boundary contracts.
AI suggestions flatten culturally situated voice Preserve dialect, code-switching, local idiom, indirectness, honorifics, family/community framing, and story-first structure unless the user asks otherwise. Cultural voice, identity, dialect, and boundary contracts.
Options become the same template in different pants Use meaningfully different strategies: cleaner, warmer, sharper, plainer, or more source-textured. Option-count, option-diversity, and output-shape contracts.
Plain language turns into generic simplification Put source-supported actors next to actions, keep uncertainty, and refuse invented facts. Reader-action, protected-fact, polarity, and numeric/entity drift checks.
Skills waste context or hide behavior Keep SKILL.md compact, move heavy checks to scripts, and publish scorecards. Progressive-disclosure validation and release-asset checks.

Clone this wiki locally