Repository navigation
R3: establish primitive-boundary topology - #4
Riverbraid wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4b86ef46c1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| **Lifecycle category:** canonical | ||
| **Normative source:** Riverbraid-Core | ||
| **Claim boundary:** Declared Conditions Only | ||
| > Lifecycle: ACTIVE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Declaring the repository ACTIVE only in the README leaves repo.role.json reporting "role": "PARKED_RESEARCH". Any registry or automation that consumes the repository's machine-readable role metadata will therefore continue classifying this surface as parked, contradicting the newly documented active lifecycle; update the metadata as part of the transition or avoid claiming the transition here.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
R3 scope
Integrate the exact read-only-reconciled R3 branch for
Riverbraid/Riverbraid-Cognitionintomain.main@629dc8a4a02befec489e19b82507167185daf717r3/experimental-label@4b86ef46c125c8d34f0a186acb8b28f17f805f696PASS_R3_BRANCH_SET_READY_FOR_SEPARATE_PR_REVIEWThis PR uses the exact S11-selected R3 branch
r3/experimental-labelat4b86ef46c125c8d34f0a186acb8b28f17f805f69for Set003 sequence 6.Set003 operation classes: REPLACE_PATH=1.
Boundary
Creating this PR does not merge it and does not authorize merge, ref movement, branch deletion, tagging, release creation, repository settings changes, or any other mutation. It does not claim truth, trust, evidentiary weight, legitimacy, certification, safety, production readiness, adoption, or external validation. Repository-specific authority and experimental/noncontrolling labels remain exactly scoped as already reviewed.