Skip to content

About

Who Improves the Robot? Toward Physical Recursive Self-Improvement

Resources

Stars

26 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Latest commit

 

History

39 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Physical RSI

Physical Recursive Self-Improvement

From adaptation to inherited improvement.

A paper-aligned, evidence-auditable map of recursive improvement in embodied systems.

Paper 324 works and resources in the paper catalog L0 to L5 capability taxonomy

Latest papers  |  Boundary  |  L0-L5  |  Research map  |  Paper catalog

Darwin's first evolutionary tree sketch beside Haeckel's nineteenth-century pedigree of humankind

Life is not repetition, but creation. Duration carries the whole of reality: a boundless river flowing toward a horizon with no predetermined end.
Darwin's first evolutionary tree (1837), beside Haeckel's Pedigree of Man (1874). Both works are public domain.

🔥 Latest Papers top

First posted Paper Focus
2026-10-13 EmbodiedEvo Reusable Skills and Lessons from robot execution
2026-10-09 RSI-Anything World-model-guided improvement across computational and scientific tasks
2026-10-08 Embodied Turing Machines Stateful code and shared control libraries
2026-10-07 EmbodiedRSI Hypothesis-guided exploration and code–skill evolution
2026-10-07 Video Prediction Policy 2 Video prediction and world-action modeling
2026-10-06 PhysEvo Execution tools, skills, and diagnostic-tool revision
2026-09-29 RoboHarn-Evo Hierarchical physical knowledge and continued interaction

From Evolution to Physical RSI top

Natural evolution did not become powerful because organisms changed once. Variation mattered because selection acted on it, and inheritance carried the consequences forward. Across generations, the environment became part of the history of what life could become.

Physical RSI asks whether an embodied artificial system can form an engineered counterpart to this chain. Physical interaction supplies experience, verification determines which changes are admitted, and inheritance returns accepted changes to the next improvement cycle.

Can the world change not only what a machine does, but how it produces its next improvement?

The analogy deliberately stops there. Natural selection does not owe us a protected objective, an audit trail, or a matched resource budget. An engineered recursive system does. A robot may collect more data, recover from a failed grasp, or fine-tune a policy after deployment. Retained capability gains may arise from updates to its execution system. Physical RSI additionally requires inherited revisions of the improvement procedure and independently verified gains in subsequent improvement across tasks. Grounding may come from real interaction or physics simulation; report which source drives each inherited change.

This repository is for Physical Recursive Self-Improvement research, where we study how physical interaction can drive retained changes in embodied systems and the processes that improve them. It follows the evidence boundaries of the accompanying paper and serves as a reading map, not a leaderboard: labels such as "self-improving," "autonomous," or "lifelong" are not treated as evidence on their own.

This repository is actively maintained. If an author would prefer not to have a paper listed here, please contact shangding.gu@berkeley.edu. Constructive comments, corrections, and suggestions are welcome.

You are also welcome to update the collection. To suggest a missing paper or correct an existing entry, you can:

Content

Explore the framework, paper collection, and open questions:


The Boundary top

Physical RSI distinguishes the execution system M = (Θ, H)—models and their harness—from its improvement procedure Φ = (Adapt, Train, Ver). Improving task performance is not the same as improving the procedure that produces future updates.

Physical RSI architecture and L0–L5 framework

Task execution, the improvement procedure, safety and control, and the L0–L5 framework.

Capability Map top

The framework separates what changes from where the retained gain transfers:

  • L0: no autonomous retained-improvement loop.
  • L1 / L3: inherited execution-system updates improve the same task / transfer across tasks.
  • L2 / L4: inherited improvement-procedure updates support same-task / cross-task improvement.
  • L5: successive procedure revisions produce better subsequent improvements under matched budgets and protected cross-task evaluation—not merely a changed procedure.

Capability versus meta-level updates, and task identity through skill sequences

Update targets and task identity: a new scene alone does not establish a new task.

Harness Adaptation, Training, and Verification top

  • Harness adaptation: use execution feedback and improvement history to update memory, skills, tools, and workflows, retaining adopted changes for later execution.
  • Model training: collect and select experience, evaluate outcomes and assign credit, update model parameters, then verify and consolidate accepted changes.
  • Safety and control: constrain trials and reassess safeguards as the system changes.
  • Verification and evaluation: decide which changes may be retained, then independently measure their later benefit.
  • Benchmarks: assess task performance, robustness, feedback reliability, and development processes.

Paper Catalog top

Some works span multiple functions and topics; each is listed once under the category that best reflects its primary contribution.

Browse by topic

Foundations and Surveys

Self-Modifying Systems and Recursive Improvement

RSI and AutoML Foundations and Surveys

Agent Harnesses and Execution

Memory, skills, tools, and workflows used during task execution, together with methods for updating these resources.

Memory and Knowledge Management

Includes persistent execution guidance and tool documentation, as well as explicit memory systems.

Skill Libraries and Tool Construction

Planning and Workflows

Failure Diagnosis and Execution Recovery

Model Training and Adaptation

Data preparation, learning methods, and learned models for robot improvement, including human-assisted learning, autonomous practice, and continual transfer.

Data Preparation and Generation

Imitation Learning and Generalist Policies

Reinforcement Learning and Autonomous Practice

Self-Supervised and Representation Learning

Continual Adaptation and Knowledge Transfer

Training Procedures and Algorithm Optimization

Robot Learning Surveys and Foundations

Safety and Assurance

Safety during learning, acceptance, and deployment, including runtime safeguards, oversight, and integrity of the improvement process.

Safe Exploration and Constrained Learning

Safe Transfer and Update Acceptance

Runtime Control and Failure Monitoring

Oversight and Integrity Protection

Safety Surveys and Risk Taxonomies

Verification and Evaluation Methods

Candidate verification, verifier reliability, and independent evaluation of improvement outcomes.

Verification of Candidate Updates

Verifier Reliability and Meta-Verification

Evaluation of Improvement Outcomes

Benchmarks, Datasets, and Platforms

Datasets, task suites, evaluation resources, and benchmarks for embodied systems and research agents.

Shared Robot Datasets

Task Learning, Performance, and Generalization

Robustness and Physical-World Evaluation

Feedback and Evaluation Reliability

Robot Engineering and Development

RSI related Benchmarks

Open Questions top

Section 7 of the v35 manuscript identifies six open problems, listed in manuscript order:

  • Learning from uncertain physical experience: derive reliable learning signals from partial, noisy, and stochastic feedback without reinforcing errors through inherited training-procedure changes.
  • Causal attribution across harness components: distinguish failures in memory, skills, and workflows from their interactions, and isolate the effects of concurrent edits under limited physical trial budgets.
  • Non-stationarity in the improvement loop: track changing component dependencies and physical conditions, and reassess past evidence and improvement strategies without excessive revalidation costs.
  • Reward hacking and evaluation leakage: independently check physical outcomes, control evaluation feedback, and use fresh or statistically corrected final tests to distinguish real gains from exploitation of imperfect judgments.
  • Safety across recursive updates: selectively revalidate assumptions and safeguards as procedures evolve, preserve protected requirements and effective interruption, and account for risk from rejected trials, resets, and recovery.
  • Benchmarking verified recursive gain: track autonomous procedure revisions, inheritance, and reuse, and compare successive procedures from the same starting system and experience under matched tasks and resource budgets.

These are gaps scoped to the reviewed manuscript, not claims that no related work exists elsewhere.

Citation

If you find the repository useful, please cite the study

@misc{zhou2026physicalrsi,
  title         = {{Who Improves the Robot? Toward Physical Recursive Self-Improvement}},
  author        = {Hai Zhou and Fan Yang and Zeyi Chen and Lejun Zhang
                   and Chenyang Fu and Jianping Li and Jiayi Zhu
                   and Xianyang Liu and Yingxuan Yang and Lili Meng
                   and Lu Wang and Xinyang Han and Jiankai Sun
                   and Weirui Ye and Guanchu Wang and Wanhua Li
                   and Ming Zhou and Boyi Li and Ming Jin and Kun Shao
                   and Muhao Chen and Guang Chen and Lei Ma
                   and Joey Tianyi Zhou and Costas Spanos and Xia Hu
                   and Mac Schwager and Weinan Zhang and Qian Feng
                   and Shangding Gu},
  year          = {2026},
  eprint        = {2610.18842},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  primaryClass  = {cs.AI},
  url           = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18842}
}

License top

This repository is released under the MIT License. Linked papers and third-party materials remain subject to their respective licenses.

About

Who Improves the Robot? Toward Physical Recursive Self-Improvement

Resources

Stars

26 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors