Finish rocrate

[M-Jafarkhani]

This PR integrates RoCrate and Rohub into rotating-cylinders benchmark, the same implementation as linear-elastic-plate-with-hole, closing #1

[joergfunger]

wouldn't it make sense to wait until we have the package being integrated into the plate benchmark? We would now have to adapt the changes that are made there then here once again. (I'm also on holiday and do not have the time to look at the RR in detail).

[M-Jafarkhani]

I am also working on the semantic package, which could be ready to use next week. I also agree that we can merge two PRs into one (RoHub/RoCrate + Semantic Package)

[M-Jafarkhani]

This pull request introduces additional changes:

1. Split benchmark workflows

The workflows used for branch protection have been separated into three independent, tool-specific workflows:

• .github/workflows/run-benchmark-dumux.yml
• .github/workflows/run-benchmark-openfoam.yml

Although these workflows are largely similar, each is dedicated to a single simulation tool. They execute the benchmark independently and do not interact with RoHub.

2. Dedicated RoHub integration workflow

A new workflow, .github/workflows/rohub-integration.yml, has been introduced to test the RoHub integration. It performs the following steps:

1. Downloads the benchmark data from RoHub.
2. Invokes the tool-specific benchmark workflows listed above to generate an aggregated RO-Crate.
3. Uploads the aggregated RO-Crate back to RoHub.

3. Integration of the semantic-benchmark package

This pull request also refactors the shared semantic benchmark functionality into a standalone Python package. The package is now published on the Python Package Index and can be installed with:

pip install semantic-benchmark

This allows the shared functionality to be reused across repositories while keeping the benchmark workflows simpler and easier to maintain.

@Sarbani-Roy