chore(security): bumps nodemailer 8→9 et better-auth 1.6.23 - #25
Conversation
La 9.0.1 impose disableFileAccess/disableUrlAccess sur l'option `raw` (vuln lecture fichier / SSRF). Notre mailer.ts n'utilise que l'API SMTP basique (inchangée en v9) ; le seul breaking change v9 (validation TLS stricte sur les requêtes sortantes : attachements distants, OAuth2, proxy) ne nous concerne pas. Vérifié : nodemailer absent de `pnpm audit`, sendMail v9 OK (même forme d'appel), typecheck vert. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mise à jour de la lib d'auth (8 patchs de retard), même mineure. Aucune migration de schéma nécessaire. Vérifié end-to-end : envoi magic-link → verify (302 + cookie session) → appel authentifié /api/billing/summary (200). Typecheck OK, 124/124 tests verts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
✅ Deploy Preview for monumental-speculoos-a69398 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 44 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Suite du durcissement sécu (#24). Deux mises à jour de dépendances, chacune testée.
nodemailer 8.0.10 → 9.0.3
Corrige GHSA-p6gq-j5cr-w38f (l'option
rawcontournaitdisableFileAccess/disableUrlAccess→ lecture fichier / SSRF). Notremailer.tsn'utilise que l'API SMTP basique (inchangée en v9) ; le seul breaking change v9 (validation TLS stricte sur requêtes sortantes) ne nous concerne pas.nodemailerabsent depnpm auditsendMailv9 accepte notre forme d'appel (testjsonTransport)better-auth 1.6.15 → 1.6.23
8 patchs sécu/bugfix de la lib d'auth, même mineure, aucune migration de schéma.
/api/billing/summary(200)Validation
pnpm install --frozen-lockfileOK · typecheck OK · 124/124 tests verts.🤖 Generated with Claude Code