Skip to content

chore(security): bumps nodemailer 8→9 et better-auth 1.6.23 - #25

Merged
Tbeaumont79 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/dep-bumps-security
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

Tbeaumont79 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/dep-bumps-security

Conversation

@Tbeaumont79

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Suite du durcissement sécu (#24). Deux mises à jour de dépendances, chacune testée.

nodemailer 8.0.10 → 9.0.3

Corrige GHSA-p6gq-j5cr-w38f (l'option raw contournait disableFileAccess/disableUrlAccess → lecture fichier / SSRF). Notre mailer.ts n'utilise que l'API SMTP basique (inchangée en v9) ; le seul breaking change v9 (validation TLS stricte sur requêtes sortantes) ne nous concerne pas.

  • ✅ nodemailer absent de pnpm audit
  • ✅ sendMail v9 accepte notre forme d'appel (test jsonTransport)

better-auth 1.6.15 → 1.6.23

8 patchs sécu/bugfix de la lib d'auth, même mineure, aucune migration de schéma.

  • ✅ Login testé end-to-end : magic-link → verify (302 + cookie session) → appel authentifié /api/billing/summary (200)

Validation

pnpm install --frozen-lockfile OK · typecheck OK · 124/124 tests verts.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Tbeaumont79 and others added 2 commits July 2, 2026 17:03
La 9.0.1 impose disableFileAccess/disableUrlAccess sur l'option `raw` (vuln
lecture fichier / SSRF). Notre mailer.ts n'utilise que l'API SMTP basique
(inchangée en v9) ; le seul breaking change v9 (validation TLS stricte sur les
requêtes sortantes : attachements distants, OAuth2, proxy) ne nous concerne pas.

Vérifié : nodemailer absent de `pnpm audit`, sendMail v9 OK (même forme d'appel),
typecheck vert.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mise à jour de la lib d'auth (8 patchs de retard), même mineure. Aucune migration
de schéma nécessaire.

Vérifié end-to-end : envoi magic-link → verify (302 + cookie session) → appel
authentifié /api/billing/summary (200). Typecheck OK, 124/124 tests verts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deploy Preview for monumental-speculoos-a69398 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 72305a9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/monumental-speculoos-a69398/deploys/6a467dd5f13cd700082c319e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-25--monumental-speculoos-a69398.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Tbeaumont79, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 44 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8e9911b4-bb99-41fd-9528-8ac5c1b85c52

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf6ef8f and 72305a9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/app/package.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/dep-bumps-security

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Tbeaumont79
Tbeaumont79 merged commit 24aeb6f into main Jul 2, 2026
5 of 7 checks passed
@Tbeaumont79
Tbeaumont79 deleted the chore/dep-bumps-security branch July 2, 2026 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant