[WTH-413] 하네스 업데이트#81
Hidden character warning
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 16 minutes and 52 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 Walkthrough🎯 안내이 PR은 AI 기반 개발 하네스의 중앙 집중식 재구조화 및 검증 체계 강화를 수행합니다. 단순 규칙 문서 이동이 아닌, 실행 가능한 검증 인프라(평가자 에이전트, Konsist 테스트, 무결성 검증)를 함께 도입하는 대규모 구조 변경입니다. 🎯 걷어보기
📋 변경 사항심볼릭 링크 설정 및 하네스 무결성 검증
구현 평가자 에이전트 및 평가 워크플로
Konsist 기반 아키텍처 검증 테스트
규칙 문서 중앙 통합 및 재정리
스킬 문서 확장 및 재정리
에이전트 설정 업데이트
지원 스크립트, 설정, 문서
🎯 코드 리뷰 예상 소요 시간🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes 📌 관련 PR
🏷️ 추천 레이블
🐰 토끼의 축하 시
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
soo0711
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
우왕 엄청 많이 다이어트 됐네요!! 한번 사용해보면서 비교해보겠습니다!
감사합니당!!
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- 평가자 allowlist에서 git --output/-o 쓰기 옵션 차단 - 평가 발동 조건을 수용 기준 채워진 active 태스크 파일로 강화 - current-task.md gitignore + template.md만 추적 - AGENTS.md에 verification.md 진입점 추가 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (3)
.claude/skills/architecture-guide/SKILL.md (3)
24-37:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
CreatePostUseCase예시는 새Post.create시그니처에 맞추고, 파일 업로드를 트랜잭션 밖으로 빼세요.지금은
imageUrl인자를 넘기지 못하는데도 업로드 호출이@Transactional안에 남아 있습니다. 그대로 복사하면 컴파일이 깨지고, 불필요한 외부 I/O가 DB 트랜잭션을 길게 잡습니다.수정 예시
class CreatePostUseCase( private val postRepository: PostRepository, // Same domain → Repository directly private val userReader: UserReader, // Cross-domain → Reader interface - private val fileStorage: FileStoragePort, // Port interface private val postMapper: PostMapper // Mapper ) { `@Transactional` fun execute(userId: Long, request: CreatePostRequest): PostResponse { val user = userReader.findById(userId) ?: throw UserNotFoundException() - val imageUrl = fileStorage.upload(request.image) - val post = Post.create(request.title, request.content, imageUrl, user) + val post = Post.create(request.title, request.content, user) postRepository.save(post) return postMapper.toResponse(post) } }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.claude/skills/architecture-guide/SKILL.md around lines 24 - 37, The execute method in CreatePostUseCase currently performs fileStorage.upload inside the `@Transactional` block and doesn't match the new Post.create signature; move the file upload out of the transactional boundary and call fileStorage.upload(request.image) before entering the `@Transactional` scope, then inside the transaction call Post.create(request.title, request.content, imageUrl, user) (or the new signature) and postRepository.save(post); keep `@Transactional` on the section that touches user lookup/create and postRepository.save, and ensure CreatePostUseCase.execute uses the imageUrl returned from fileStorage.upload when constructing the Post.
183-187:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
update에도 생성과 같은 유효성 검증을 유지하세요.지금은 update 경로로는 빈 제목이나 너무 긴 내용을 다시 넣을 수 있습니다.
create()에서 막는 제약과 맞춰야 엔티티 불변식이 유지됩니다.수정 예시
fun update(title: String, content: String) { check(status != PostStatus.DELETED) { "Deleted posts cannot be updated" } + require(title.isNotBlank()) { "Title must not be blank" } + require(content.length <= 5000) { "Content must be 5000 chars or less" } this.title = title this.content = content }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.claude/skills/architecture-guide/SKILL.md around lines 183 - 187, The update(title:String, content:String) method currently only checks for deleted status; add the same validation rules used in create() so entity invariants hold: validate non-empty title, enforce max title length, and enforce max content length (or delegate to the same helper/validation functions used by create()), and fail consistently (same exception/message) if validations fail; keep the existing status check (status != PostStatus.DELETED) and then assign this.title and this.content only after validations pass.
115-128:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
orderMapper를 생성자에 주입하지 않아서 예시가 컴파일되지 않습니다.
orderMapper.toResponse(order)를 호출하지만, 생성자나 본문 어디에도orderMapper가 선언돼 있지 않습니다.수정 예시
class CreateOrderUseCase( private val orderRepository: OrderRepository, - private val productRepository: ProductRepository // Cross-domain write → Repository directly + private val productRepository: ProductRepository, // Cross-domain write → Repository directly + private val orderMapper: OrderMapper ) {🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.claude/skills/architecture-guide/SKILL.md around lines 115 - 128, The CreateOrderUseCase example is missing the orderMapper dependency used in execute; add an OrderMapper (or appropriate mapper type) as a constructor-injected field on the CreateOrderUseCase class (alongside orderRepository and productRepository) so orderMapper.toResponse(order) compiles, and ensure the injected property name matches the call in execute.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.claude/rules/testing.md (1)
25-25: ⚡ Quick win
@WebMvcTest와 Testcontainers를 분리하세요.슬라이스 테스트와 DB 컨테이너 통합 테스트를 같은 분류로 묶으면 규칙이 모호해집니다. DB/트랜잭션은
@SpringBootTest + Testcontainers, 컨트롤러 계약은@WebMvcTest로 나누는 편이 더 일관적입니다.♻️ 제안 수정
-Integration tests (`@SpringBootTest`/`@WebMvcTest` + Testcontainers) are for DB queries, API endpoints, and transaction behavior; everything else is a plain unit test with MockK. +Integration tests (`@SpringBootTest` + Testcontainers) are for DB queries and transaction behavior. +Controller contract tests use `@WebMvcTest` without Testcontainers.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.claude/rules/testing.md at line 25, 테스트 분류가 모호하므로 DB/트랜잭션 의존 테스트는 `@SpringBootTest와` Testcontainers 조합으로 이동하고, 컨트롤러 계약(웹 레이어) 테스트는 Testcontainers를 제거한 채 `@WebMvcTest로` 분리하며, 나머지 로직·의존성은 MockK로 단위 테스트화하세요; 구체적으로는 DB 쿼리·트랜잭션 검증 코드는 SpringBootTest + Testcontainers로 유지(혹은 새 파일로 분리)하고, Controller 관련 테스트는 `@WebMvcTest에` MockMvc/MockBean을 사용해 Testcontainers 설정과 DB 의존을 제거하며, 서비스/레포지토리의 외부 의존성은 MockK로 목 처리해 중복되는 Testcontainers 설정과 불필요한 통합 범위를 제거하세요.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.claude/agents/implementation-evaluator.md:
- Around line 54-66: The fenced code block in
.claude/agents/implementation-evaluator.md is missing a language specifier
(triggering markdownlint MD040); update the triple-backtick opening for that
block to include a language token such as text (e.g., change ``` to ```text) so
the block is explicitly annotated and the lint warning is resolved.
In @.claude/hooks/evaluator-bash-allowlist.sh:
- Around line 35-39: 현재 case 패턴은 공백이 있는 '-o'만 잡아서 'git diff -oout.patch' 같은 형태가
통과됩니다; NORMALIZED을 검사하는 해당 case 분기(현재 "*' --output='* | *' --output '* | *' -o
'*)에 공백 없는 '-o' 접두도 차단되도록 패턴을 추가하거나 범위를 넓혀서 '-o'가 붙어 있어도 매칭되게 바꿔주세요(예: 추가 패턴
*'-o'* 또는 '* -o'* 및 '*-o'* 중 하나를 사용하여 공백 유무에 상관없이 거부하도록 수정) — deny 메시지("쓰기 가능한
출력 옵션 포함: $COMMAND")는 그대로 사용하면 됩니다.
In @.claude/hooks/ktlint-format.sh:
- Around line 23-28: The script downloads the ktlint binary and immediately
marks it executable without verifying integrity; add a SHA-256 verification step
using a new KTLINT_SHA256 variable: download to a temporary file (e.g.,
"$KTLINT_BIN.tmp"), compute its sha256sum, compare against KTLINT_SHA256, and
only if they match, chmod +x and move/rename the temp file to "$KTLINT_BIN"; on
mismatch, delete the temp file, log an error and exit non‑zero. Keep existing
variables KTLINT_BIN, KTLINT_VERSION and CACHE_DIR, and fail fast if sha256
utilities (sha256sum or shasum) are missing.
In @.claude/rules/verification.md:
- Around line 45-46: The document contains conflicting guidance about
current-task.md: lines 13–15 mark current-task.md as untracked, but lines 45–46
say it appears in PR diffs; make them consistent by keeping the policy that
current-task.md is untracked (per existing policy) and update the text at the
later reference (the wording around "lands in the PR diff") to state it is
excluded/ignored and will not be committed or shown in PR diffs; search for all
occurrences of "current-task.md" in the file and remove or reword any statements
that claim it appears in PR diffs so the document uniformly documents the
untracked/ignored policy.
In @.claude/scripts/audit-skill-invocations.sh:
- Around line 64-69: The audit script currently assumes d.get("content") is a
string and appends it to texts, causing a TypeError when content is a
list/object; change the block that handles local_command so you only append when
content is a string: retrieve content = d.get("content"), guard with
isinstance(content, str) (or skip non-str values), and only then
texts.append(content); keep the subsequent regex matching using cmd_pattern and
user_commands unchanged.
In @.claude/settings.json:
- Line 19: 현재 설정의 "Read(**/.env)" 항목은 오직 ".env" 하나만 차단하므로 ".env.local",
".env.prod" 등은 여전히 노출됩니다; 설정에서 Read(**/.env) 항목을 Read(**/.env*)(또는
Read(**/.env.*)처럼 편한 와일드카드)로 변경하여 ".env"로 시작하는 모든 파일을 차단하도록 수정하세요 — 수정 대상 식별자:
"Read(**/.env)".
In @.claude/skills/test-create/SKILL.md:
- Around line 24-34: For each affected fenced code block, update the opening
fence to include the language "text" (i.e. change ``` to ```text) so the
markdown linter MD040 is satisfied: in .claude/skills/test-create/SKILL.md
(lines 24-34) change the directory tree block fence to ```text; in
.claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md (lines 26-33) change the session
checklist block fence to ```text; in .claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md
(lines 39-45) change the trigger checklist block fence to ```text; and in
.claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md (lines 84-88) change the Glob/Grep
example block fence to ```text.
In `@docs/plan/ai-verification-hardening-plan.md`:
- Around line 149-153: The fenced code block shown (the triple-backtick block
currently starting with "```" and containing the lines "판정: PASS | NEEDS_WORK"
etc.) needs a language identifier to satisfy markdownlint MD040; update the
opening fence from "```" to "```text" (or another appropriate language) so the
code block is language-tagged and the linter warning is resolved.
---
Outside diff comments:
In @.claude/skills/architecture-guide/SKILL.md:
- Around line 24-37: The execute method in CreatePostUseCase currently performs
fileStorage.upload inside the `@Transactional` block and doesn't match the new
Post.create signature; move the file upload out of the transactional boundary
and call fileStorage.upload(request.image) before entering the `@Transactional`
scope, then inside the transaction call Post.create(request.title,
request.content, imageUrl, user) (or the new signature) and
postRepository.save(post); keep `@Transactional` on the section that touches user
lookup/create and postRepository.save, and ensure CreatePostUseCase.execute uses
the imageUrl returned from fileStorage.upload when constructing the Post.
- Around line 183-187: The update(title:String, content:String) method currently
only checks for deleted status; add the same validation rules used in create()
so entity invariants hold: validate non-empty title, enforce max title length,
and enforce max content length (or delegate to the same helper/validation
functions used by create()), and fail consistently (same exception/message) if
validations fail; keep the existing status check (status != PostStatus.DELETED)
and then assign this.title and this.content only after validations pass.
- Around line 115-128: The CreateOrderUseCase example is missing the orderMapper
dependency used in execute; add an OrderMapper (or appropriate mapper type) as a
constructor-injected field on the CreateOrderUseCase class (alongside
orderRepository and productRepository) so orderMapper.toResponse(order)
compiles, and ensure the injected property name matches the call in execute.
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.claude/rules/testing.md:
- Line 25: 테스트 분류가 모호하므로 DB/트랜잭션 의존 테스트는 `@SpringBootTest와` Testcontainers 조합으로
이동하고, 컨트롤러 계약(웹 레이어) 테스트는 Testcontainers를 제거한 채 `@WebMvcTest로` 분리하며, 나머지 로직·의존성은
MockK로 단위 테스트화하세요; 구체적으로는 DB 쿼리·트랜잭션 검증 코드는 SpringBootTest + Testcontainers로
유지(혹은 새 파일로 분리)하고, Controller 관련 테스트는 `@WebMvcTest에` MockMvc/MockBean을 사용해
Testcontainers 설정과 DB 의존을 제거하며, 서비스/레포지토리의 외부 의존성은 MockK로 목 처리해 중복되는
Testcontainers 설정과 불필요한 통합 범위를 제거하세요.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 861d42ec-2308-4550-be8a-6ec66a12577f
📒 Files selected for processing (62)
.agents/rules.agents/rules/api-design.md.agents/rules/architecture.md.agents/rules/code-style.md.agents/rules/exception-handling.md.agents/rules/git-conventions.md.agents/rules/mapper-dto.md.agents/rules/testing.md.agents/rules/transaction-concurrency.md.agents/skills.agents/skills/architecture-guide/SKILL.md.agents/skills/code-review/SKILL.md.agents/skills/context-update/SKILL.md.agents/skills/database-manage/SKILL.md.agents/skills/database-manage/scripts/dump-schema.sh.agents/skills/kotlin-migration/SKILL.md.agents/skills/rule-create/SKILL.md.agents/skills/skill-create/SKILL.md.agents/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md.agents/skills/test-create/SKILL.md.agents/skills/test-create/references/kotlin-examples.md.agents/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md.claude/agents/feature-developer-agent.md.claude/agents/implementation-evaluator.md.claude/agents/kotlin-migration-agent.md.claude/agents/system-architect-agent.md.claude/hooks/evaluator-bash-allowlist.sh.claude/hooks/ktlint-format.sh.claude/rules/api-design.md.claude/rules/architecture.md.claude/rules/code-style.md.claude/rules/exception-handling.md.claude/rules/git-conventions.md.claude/rules/mapper-dto.md.claude/rules/testing.md.claude/rules/transaction-concurrency.md.claude/rules/verification.md.claude/scripts/audit-skill-invocations.sh.claude/scripts/check-harness.sh.claude/settings.json.claude/skills/api-contract-update/SKILL.md.claude/skills/api-contract-update/references/code-registry.md.claude/skills/api-contract-update/references/controller-contract.md.claude/skills/api-contract-update/references/error-docs.md.claude/skills/api-contract-update/references/pagination-response.md.claude/skills/architecture-guide/SKILL.md.claude/skills/concurrency-safety/SKILL.md.claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md.claude/skills/git-prepare/SKILL.md.claude/skills/kotlin-migration/SKILL.md.claude/skills/test-create/SKILL.md.claude/skills/test-create/references/java-examples.md.claude/skills/verify-implementation/SKILL.md.claude/tasks/template.md.github/workflows/ci.yml.gitignoreAGENTS.mdCLAUDE.mdbuild.gradle.ktsdocs/plan/ai-verification-hardening-plan.mdlombok.configsrc/test/kotlin/com/weeth/architecture/ArchitectureTest.kt
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (24)
- .agents/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md
- .claude/skills/kotlin-migration/SKILL.md
- .agents/rules/exception-handling.md
- .agents/skills/architecture-guide/SKILL.md
- .agents/skills/skill-create/SKILL.md
- .agents/rules/architecture.md
- .agents/rules/code-style.md
- .agents/skills/test-create/references/kotlin-examples.md
- .agents/skills/test-create/SKILL.md
- .agents/skills/rule-create/SKILL.md
- .agents/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md
- .agents/rules/transaction-concurrency.md
- .agents/rules/testing.md
- .agents/rules/git-conventions.md
- .agents/skills/context-update/SKILL.md
- .agents/skills/kotlin-migration/SKILL.md
- .agents/skills/database-manage/SKILL.md
- .agents/skills/database-manage/scripts/dump-schema.sh
- lombok.config
- .claude/skills/test-create/references/java-examples.md
- .claude/agents/kotlin-migration-agent.md
- .agents/rules/api-design.md
- .agents/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
- .agents/rules/mapper-dto.md
| ``` | ||
| 판정: PASS | NEEDS_WORK | ||
|
|
||
| 기준별 결과: | ||
| 1. 요구사항 충족: 통과|불통과 — 증거: <파일:라인 / 명령 출력 요약> | ||
| 2. 아키텍처 준수: 통과|불통과 — 증거: ... | ||
| 3. 테스트: 통과|불통과 — 증거: <실행한 명령 + 결과 요약 + 테스트 품질 판단 근거> | ||
| 4. API 계약: 통과|불통과|해당 없음 — 증거: ... | ||
|
|
||
| (NEEDS_WORK 시) | ||
| 미비점: | ||
| - <구체적 항목 — 무엇이, 어디서(파일:라인), 왜 기준에 미달하는지. 다음 빌더 세션의 입력이 된다> | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
코드 블록 언어 미지정으로 markdownlint 경고가 발생합니다.
Line 54의 fenced code block에 언어 지정이 없어 MD040 경고가 납니다. lint 일관성을 위해 언어(text 등)를 명시하세요.
패치 제안
-```
+```text
판정: PASS | NEEDS_WORK
기준별 결과:
1. 요구사항 충족: 통과|불통과 — 증거: <파일:라인 / 명령 출력 요약>
2. 아키텍처 준수: 통과|불통과 — 증거: ...
3. 테스트: 통과|불통과 — 증거: <실행한 명령 + 결과 요약 + 테스트 품질 판단 근거>
4. API 계약: 통과|불통과|해당 없음 — 증거: ...
(NEEDS_WORK 시)
미비점:
- <구체적 항목 — 무엇이, 어디서(파일:라인), 왜 기준에 미달하는지. 다음 빌더 세션의 입력이 된다></details>
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
```suggestion
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)
[warning] 54-54: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.claude/agents/implementation-evaluator.md around lines 54 - 66, The fenced
code block in .claude/agents/implementation-evaluator.md is missing a language
specifier (triggering markdownlint MD040); update the triple-backtick opening
for that block to include a language token such as text (e.g., change ``` to
```text) so the block is explicitly annotated and the lint warning is resolved.
Source: Linters/SAST tools
| # 읽기성 git 명령이라도 파일 쓰기가 가능한 출력 옵션은 차단 | ||
| case "$NORMALIZED" in | ||
| *' --output='* | *' --output '* | *' -o '*) | ||
| deny "쓰기 가능한 출력 옵션 포함: $COMMAND" | ||
| ;; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
git -o<파일> 형태가 차단되지 않아 읽기 전용 보장을 우회할 수 있습니다.
Line 37은 -o만 막아서 git diff -oout.patch/git show -oout.patch가 통과합니다. 파일 쓰기 경로가 남아 있으므로 -o 접두 전체를 차단해야 합니다.
패치 제안
case "$NORMALIZED" in
- *' --output='* | *' --output '* | *' -o '*)
+ *' --output='* | *' --output '* | *' -o'* | *$'\t-o'*)
deny "쓰기 가능한 출력 옵션 포함: $COMMAND"
;;
esac📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # 읽기성 git 명령이라도 파일 쓰기가 가능한 출력 옵션은 차단 | |
| case "$NORMALIZED" in | |
| *' --output='* | *' --output '* | *' -o '*) | |
| deny "쓰기 가능한 출력 옵션 포함: $COMMAND" | |
| ;; | |
| # 읽기성 git 명령이라도 파일 쓰기가 가능한 출력 옵션은 차단 | |
| case "$NORMALIZED" in | |
| *' --output='* | *' --output '* | *' -o'* | *$'\t-o'*) | |
| deny "쓰기 가능한 출력 옵션 포함: $COMMAND" | |
| ;; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.claude/hooks/evaluator-bash-allowlist.sh around lines 35 - 39, 현재 case 패턴은
공백이 있는 '-o'만 잡아서 'git diff -oout.patch' 같은 형태가 통과됩니다; NORMALIZED을 검사하는 해당 case
분기(현재 "*' --output='* | *' --output '* | *' -o '*)에 공백 없는 '-o' 접두도 차단되도록 패턴을
추가하거나 범위를 넓혀서 '-o'가 붙어 있어도 매칭되게 바꿔주세요(예: 추가 패턴 *'-o'* 또는 '* -o'* 및 '*-o'* 중 하나를
사용하여 공백 유무에 상관없이 거부하도록 수정) — deny 메시지("쓰기 가능한 출력 옵션 포함: $COMMAND")는 그대로 사용하면
됩니다.
| if d.get("type") == "system" and d.get("subtype") == "local_command": | ||
| texts.append(d.get("content") or "") | ||
| if d.get("type") in ("user", "system"): | ||
| for t in texts: | ||
| for m in cmd_pattern.findall(t): | ||
| user_commands[m] += 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
local_command content 타입 가정 때문에 감사 스크립트가 중단될 수 있습니다.
Line 65에서 d.get("content")를 문자열로 가정하고 texts에 넣은 뒤, Line 68에서 정규식 매칭을 수행합니다. content가 리스트/객체로 들어오면 findall()에서 TypeError가 나고 전체 감사가 중단됩니다. 문자열 타입만 누적하도록 가드해 주세요.
제안 수정
- if d.get("type") == "system" and d.get("subtype") == "local_command":
- texts.append(d.get("content") or "")
+ if d.get("type") == "system" and d.get("subtype") == "local_command":
+ local_cmd_content = d.get("content")
+ if isinstance(local_cmd_content, str):
+ texts.append(local_cmd_content)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.claude/scripts/audit-skill-invocations.sh around lines 64 - 69, The audit
script currently assumes d.get("content") is a string and appends it to texts,
causing a TypeError when content is a list/object; change the block that handles
local_command so you only append when content is a string: retrieve content =
d.get("content"), guard with isinstance(content, str) (or skip non-str values),
and only then texts.append(content); keep the subsequent regex matching using
cmd_pattern and user_commands unchanged.
| }, | ||
| "permissions": { | ||
| "deny": [ | ||
| "Read(**/.env)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Read(**/.env)만 차단되어 .env.* 파일 읽기 경로가 남아 있습니다.
Line 19는 .env 단일 파일만 막고 있어 .env.local, .env.prod 등은 여전히 Read로 노출됩니다. Edit/Write와 동일한 wildcard 정책으로 맞추는 게 안전합니다.
패치 제안
- "Read(**/.env)",
+ "Read(**/.env*)",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "Read(**/.env)", | |
| "Read(**/.env*)", |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.claude/settings.json at line 19, 현재 설정의 "Read(**/.env)" 항목은 오직 ".env" 하나만
차단하므로 ".env.local", ".env.prod" 등은 여전히 노출됩니다; 설정에서 Read(**/.env) 항목을
Read(**/.env*)(또는 Read(**/.env.*)처럼 편한 와일드카드)로 변경하여 ".env"로 시작하는 모든 파일을 차단하도록
수정하세요 — 수정 대상 식별자: "Read(**/.env)".
| ``` | ||
| src/test/ | ||
| ├── java/com/example/app/domain/{domain}/ | ||
| │ ├── application/usecase/ # UseCase unit tests | ||
| │ ├── domain/service/ # Service unit tests | ||
| │ ├── presentation/ # Controller tests | ||
| │ └── fixture/ # Test fixtures | ||
| └── kotlin/com/example/app/domain/{domain}/ | ||
| └── kotlin/com/weeth/domain/{domain}/ | ||
| ├── application/usecase/ | ||
| │ ├── command/ | ||
| │ └── query/ | ||
| ├── domain/entity/ | ||
| ├── domain/service/ | ||
| ├── presentation/ | ||
| └── fixture/ | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
문서용 fenced block에 언어를 지정하세요.
MD040 때문에 일부 블록이 lint에 걸립니다. 설명/트리 블록은 text, 셸 예시는 bash처럼 명시해 주세요.
.claude/skills/test-create/SKILL.md#L24-L34: 디렉터리 트리 블록에text를 추가하세요..claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md#L26-L33: 세션 체크리스트 블록에text를 추가하세요..claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md#L39-L45: 트리거 체크리스트 블록에text를 추가하세요..claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md#L84-L88:Glob/Grep예시 블록에text를 추가하세요.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)
[warning] 24-24: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
📍 Affects 2 files
.claude/skills/test-create/SKILL.md#L24-L34(this comment).claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md#L26-L33.claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md#L39-L45.claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md#L84-L88
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.claude/skills/test-create/SKILL.md around lines 24 - 34, For each affected
fenced code block, update the opening fence to include the language "text" (i.e.
change ``` to ```text) so the markdown linter MD040 is satisfied: in
.claude/skills/test-create/SKILL.md (lines 24-34) change the directory tree
block fence to ```text; in .claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md (lines 26-33)
change the session checklist block fence to ```text; in
.claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md (lines 39-45) change the trigger
checklist block fence to ```text; and in .claude/skills/context-update/SKILL.md
(lines 84-88) change the Glob/Grep example block fence to ```text.
Source: Linters/SAST tools
| ``` | ||
| 판정: PASS | NEEDS_WORK | ||
| 기준별 결과: [기준] 통과/불통과 — 증거: <파일:라인 또는 명령 출력 요약> | ||
| NEEDS_WORK 시: 구체적 미비점 목록 (다음 빌더 세션의 입력이 됨) | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
코드 블록 언어를 지정해 markdownlint(MD040) 경고를 제거해 주세요.
Line 149의 fenced code block에 언어 식별자를 넣으면 린트 경고를 해소할 수 있습니다(````text` 권장).
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)
[warning] 149-149: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/plan/ai-verification-hardening-plan.md` around lines 149 - 153, The
fenced code block shown (the triple-backtick block currently starting with "```"
and containing the lines "판정: PASS | NEEDS_WORK" etc.) needs a language
identifier to satisfy markdownlint MD040; update the opening fence from "```" to
"```text" (or another appropriate language) so the code block is language-tagged
and the linter warning is resolved.
Source: Linters/SAST tools
📌 Summary
Weeth Server의 하네스 컨텍스트를 업데이트 했습니다.
📝 Changes
What
Why
How
결과: 1,219줄 → 465줄 (-62%), 4,989단어 → 2,474단어 (-50%)
📸 Screenshots / Logs
💡 Reviewer 참고사항
implementation-evaluator Agent는 메인 세션이나 서브 에이전트가 작업을 종료한 후 사용자에게 보고하려고 하기 직전에 자동으로 트리거되어 동작하도록 설계했습니다. 만약 동작하지 않는다면 작업 마지막에 수동으로 호출해도 됩니당
✅ Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
릴리스 노트
이번 업데이트는 개발 인프라 및 내부 시스템 개선에 중점을 두고 있습니다. 최종 사용자에게 영향을 주는 새로운 기능이나 버그 수정은 포함되어 있지 않습니다.