Deepen Article Lab research evidence - #16
Merged
Merged
Conversation
erinepshovel-code
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 25, 2026 07:29
erinepshovel-code
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2026
Main's research deepening (#16) and this branch both extended the ledgers. Resolution keeps main's records and appends only this branch's non-duplicative additions: the shared Stephan & Chenoweth 2008 source and the equivalent article-six-nonviolent-power dissent claim keep main's versions; the branch's seven other sources and seven other claims are retained. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E93Rxmrs8bXHtWjD7z94bi
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Continues the balanced Article Lab research program after PR #15 by adding systematic reviews, meta-analysis, replication disputes, operational evidence, and explicit evidentiary limits across all eight Rights Articles.
This tranche tests bounded components of each Article rather than treating a paper as assenting to or dissenting from an Article as a whole.
What changed
Research evidence
Adds 11 reviewed sources and 9 claim records:
Durable ledger growth
src/_data/research/ledger-manifest.jsonEvidence and authority boundary
The canonical text remains
wayseer00/main:canon/INTERDEPENDENT_WAY.txt. Research cards do not amend or supersede canon.Each claim records its source type and limitation. Systematic reviews, experiments, formal models, legal or medicolegal analysis, and replication disputes retain different evidentiary force. Conflicting high-quality results are preserved rather than averaged into false certainty.
The manifest is repository-owned and accepts only unique
.ymlpaths beneathsrc/_data/research; it cannot point the build at arbitrary files or network locations.Validation
f78872d13f9f261aa4929ca461379e2d88519611hmmm
This tranche improves depth and preserves disagreement, but it is still not a comprehensive literature review. Further passes should add newer replications, non-English and jurisdictionally diverse evidence, implementation failures, and source-by-source correction or retraction monitoring.