Skip to content

Align EDCM with gonol-native language architecture - #66

Merged
erinepshovel-code merged 9 commits into
mainfrom
docs/gonol-language-boundary-20260817
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

erinepshovel-code merged 9 commits into
mainfrom
docs/gonol-language-boundary-20260817

Conversation

@erinepshovel-code

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Align EDCM's active documentation and agent instructions with the current UCNS gonol-native language boundary:

Unicode character gonols
        ↓
fixed floor word gonols
        ↓
complete lexical floor F
        ↓
definitions expressed only with members of F
        ↓
floor-definition gonols
  • records lexical-floor closure and the prohibition on tokenizer/subword/opaque-vector substitution;
  • distinguishes arbitrary source definition prose from floor-definition gonols;
  • scopes the existing EDCM word-gonol profile and token_* fields as frozen observation/replay producer-epoch evidence rather than current ontology;
  • preserves historical experiment and receipt identities unchanged;
  • keeps UCNS construction authority separate from EDCM measurement/evaluation authority;
  • marks EDCM semantic integration BLOCKED until UCNS emits source-bound replayable closed definition-gonol receipts;
  • updates the repo-owned work-graph report and agent instructions accordingly.

Upstream architecture source: The-Interdependency/ucns@d54c3b6b4d9867f7bc6b968e0424d702504b8497.

Validation

Documentation/coordination-only change. No EDCM runtime code, frozen evidence, canon data, profile schema, or historical artifact was modified. The branch is based directly on edcm@330876d31065e4f9fad6e801e92e87c65bf91939 with no intervening main drift at creation time.

hmmm

The exact UCNS relation/composition law for closed floor-definition gonols and the complete source/custody procedure remain unresolved upstream. EDCM has not selected a projection, metric, benchmark, or falsifier for evaluating that future representation.

@erinepshovel-code
erinepshovel-code merged commit 57c306f into main Aug 18, 2026
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant