Move text gonol construction authority into EDCM - #71
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d81225e1fa
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| ROOT / "docs" / "GONOL_LANGUAGE_BOUNDARY.md", | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new guard scans only these prose surfaces, so it passes while docs/work-graphs/repository-plan-report.json still states that EDCM is a downstream UCNS consumer, assigns morphology and definition construction to UCNS, and instructs agents to wait for upstream UCNS receipts (:27, :56, and :100-114). Portfolio tooling and agents consuming that current-plan report therefore receive the opposite authority model from this commit; migrate the report and include it in this consistency guard.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L36-L41
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| - represented evidence != candidate-measured evidence != experiment-supported evidence != canonically measured evidence. | ||
| - every admitted character is a gonol for active EDCM text construction. | ||
| - METAPAT defines affixiation; EDCM applies it; UCNS realizes its geometry where constructed. | ||
| - represented evidence != constructed representation != candidate-measured evidence != experiment-supported evidence != canonically measured evidence. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This newly makes constructed representation a non-collapsible evidence state, but CANON.md:83-92 still defines only represented, candidate-measured, experiment-supported, and canonical states and says the repository permits states 1–3. A completed but unmeasured gonol construction consequently has no canonical status and must be mislabeled as either merely represented or already measured; add the construction state to the canonical taxonomy and its permitted-state declaration.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L90-L94
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| **Corrected:** 2026-08-18. | ||
| **Status:** active EDCM text-construction and measurement boundary. | ||
| **Authority split:** METAPAT owns affixiation semantics; UCNS owns gonol/Möbius/Public Gonol geometry; EDCM owns text-domain admission and linguistic/semantic gonol construction and measurement. | ||
| **Corrected:** 2026-08-21 after UCNS geometry-only canon and skill-lib `gonol-build` authority repair. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This attributes the correction to UCNS geometry-only canon and then imports a specific METAPAT affixiation definition, but none of the changed authority surfaces records the exact governing UCNS or METAPAT commit; the hashes elsewhere in the repository belong to explicitly historical adapters and experiments. Once either upstream head moves, the source that authorized this correction and its allowed geometric operations cannot be reconstructed, despite .agents/skills/gonol-build/SKILL.md:27-36 requiring those commits before selecting construction rules; record the exact identities or preserve the boundary as hmmm.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L36-L41
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
Repair the language/gonol authority split after UCNS became geometry-only.
Current contract:
34d954aa1e2092e615b03a180500f6b6977f501eowns affixiation semantics;0fe22004927563e87e31ff707b5d80e6792efe97owns gonol/Möbius/Public Gonol geometry and geometrically established operations;For active EDCM text construction, the rule is now explicit:
every admitted character is a gonol.Changes:
gonol-buildand repin the EDCM skill subset to merged skill-liba1c6a7124af537ee9937b6fc6084940091982fe5;hmmmrather than deriving function semantics from Unicode names, dictionaries, glyph shape, adjacency, or conventional grammar.No historical evidence is promoted or rewritten, and no construction result is treated as measurement validity.