docs(plan): refresh repository portfolio report - #17
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9cdd8816e1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| "action": "use the separately attributed fallback where this role-acquisition behavior is required", | ||
| "owner": "The-Interdependency/ptcna", | ||
| "dependency": "FALSIFIED routes useful operation to the fallback; SURVIVED — not proved preserves the architecture for the next bounded test; UNRESOLVED repairs only the failed prerequisite" | ||
| "dependency": "fallback usefulness survived this local acquisition program, but production utility and generalization remain unestablished" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The frozen plan defines usefulness only as target_accuracy >= minimum_target_accuracy, and the sealed receipt records a usefulness verdict only for the PTCNA target; it never preregisters a fallback-usefulness threshold or verdict. When portfolio consumers follow this next action, saying fallback usefulness “survived” converts the observed comparator accuracy into a post-hoc empirical verdict and can incorrectly justify routing useful operation to it. Report the comparator accuracy without assigning usefulness, or retain fallback usefulness as hmmm until separately preregistered and evaluated.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L35-L38
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Refresh the repo-owned work-graph report to the exact cited main state. The report commit is coordination metadata and does not upgrade runtime, mathematical, semantic, empirical, measurement, deployment, or theorem standing.\n\nValidated together with the explicit seven-repository portfolio projection under skill-lib@b4234ca; projection identity:
f907b9d0fad7d4f0562cc13c9a7cb11d5d3ec2a5e7e534644a2b38c797d6419d.