Skip to content

Bind $5 audit and two-question product surface - #12

Merged
erinepshovel-code merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
product-surface
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

erinepshovel-code merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
product-surface

Conversation

@erinepshovel-code

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates the hosted pubskill surface around the product distinctions established in review.

  • Repository Audit asks: “Which repository claims hold up, and which fail against the evidence?”
  • Repository Examiner asks: “What is actually in this codebase, how is it structured and documented, what can be measured safely, and where are the unresolved boundaries?”
  • Keeps the first decision surface to Audit vs Examiner.
  • Makes the Examiner distinction explicit: structural examination requires no AI; narration is optional.
  • Prices the complete repository audit at $5 after three free findings.
  • Binds the service to the new live $5 Stripe payment link, which redirects completed checkout back to pubskill with the Checkout Session ID for automatic verification.
  • Does not pretend hosted Examiner checkout is finished; that boundary remains visible as hmmm pending real metering.

@erinepshovel-code
erinepshovel-code merged commit 53a4fb7 into main Sep 15, 2026
7 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bcf138f966

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread service.py
Comment on lines +20 to +22
PAYMENT_LINK_ID = "plink_1UFlbvAyiOEDWiRnnsPOpA2P"
PAYMENT_LINK_URL = "https://buy.stripe.com/bJe9AS94w9MW09B7705EY02"
PRICE_CENTS = 500

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Continue honoring purchases from the previous payment link

Replacing the sole accepted payment-link ID and amount invalidates every Checkout Session created by the former live $19 link. In particular, a customer who opened that checkout before this deployment but completes it afterward will be charged and then receive payment does not belong to this product from /paid; retries of earlier failed audits are also denied. Keep accepting the previous ID/amount pair alongside the new $5 pair, at least for existing sessions.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread index.html
}

document.getElementById("choose-audit").addEventListener("click", () => selectProduct("audit"));
document.getElementById("choose-examiner").addEventListener("click", () => selectProduct("examiner"));

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Give the Examiner selection a usable next step

When a visitor chooses Examiner, this handler only unhides an informational panel; that panel has no runnable action, CLI command, or direct link to the documented Examiner instructions, despite telling the visitor that the CLI is available now. The newly advertised product flow therefore ends without telling users how to obtain the product they selected. Add a direct CLI/source-instructions link or another usable Examiner action.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-15T02:02:30.862511Z bcf138f PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant