Skip to content

fix(pitch): honest deck F10 — recalibration board, not a fake flip#91

Merged
ComBba merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pitch/honest-f10-deck
Jun 6, 2026
Merged

fix(pitch): honest deck F10 — recalibration board, not a fake flip#91
ComBba merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pitch/honest-f10-deck

Conversation

@ComBba

@ComBba ComBba commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes the review's highest-risk item (H-4): the F10 board showed an illustrative Project B #1 → Project A #1 flip under 'The audit changes who wins', contradicting the live /judge footage (no rank change · ±0 pts · Δ=0) and the now-honest F10 narration (#90).

Now the board shows the real cohort — Glasshat 54.3→52.8, MeshSight 54.0→52.5: same ranking in both columns, scores recalibrated, Glasshat still #1 (earned, not flipped). Badge 'ranking holds · Δ=0 · no fake flip'. Speaker-note h2/VO/delivery/overview/keys all aligned. The Arize span tree (104 spans) is unchanged.

Browser-verified the slide renders. Deck video regenerated to match.

…e flip

The review's highest-risk juxtaposition (H-4): the F10 rank-flip board showed an
illustrative "Project B #1 -> Project A #1" flip under "The audit changes who wins",
which contradicts the live /judge footage ("no rank change · +/-0 pts · delta=0") and
the now-honest F10 narration. Rewrote the slide to match reality:

- The judge board now shows the real cohort (Glasshat 54.3/52.8, MeshSight 54.0/52.5):
  same ranking in both columns, scores recalibrated down, Glasshat still #1 (earned,
  not flipped). Badge "ranking holds · delta=0 · no fake flip"; footer "every score
  recalibrated, not reordered · hit@13 0.6154 binary Winner-label · live Phoenix-MCP".
- Speaker note h2 "The audit changes who wins." -> "Recalibrated. Not reordered.";
  VO + delivery + overview tile + keys hint all aligned to the honest beat (and the
  delivery note now says the narration must match the on-screen "no rank change").

Pairs with #90 (honest F10 narration). The Arize span tree (104 spans · 1 trace) on
the left is unchanged. Deck video will be re-generated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@ComBba, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 52 minutes and 4 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 73a54da4-6fa7-4bee-acb0-d3f36d4ab47f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 223a2ae and 8ffdd1e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pitch/deck.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch pitch/honest-f10-deck

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ComBba
ComBba merged commit aa60bf9 into main Jun 6, 2026
5 checks passed
@ComBba
ComBba deleted the pitch/honest-f10-deck branch June 6, 2026 10:49

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the presentation deck in pitch/deck.html to shift the narrative from claiming a rank flip ("The audit changes who wins") to showing that scores are recalibrated without changing the overall ranking ("Recalibrated. Not reordered. Δ=0"). This includes updating slide content, hardcoded scores, voiceover scripts, and navigation keys. The reviewer pointed out a discrepancy between the hardcoded scores in the slide and the actual scores calculated from the real cohort data in sample-cohort.ts, providing a code suggestion to align these values.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread pitch/deck.html
Comment on lines +1119 to +1125
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:2.8s"><span>Glasshat</span><span>54.3</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:3.0s"><span>MeshSight</span><span>54.0</span></div>
</div>
<div class="col">
<h6>with Glasshat audit</h6>
<div class="rk win" data-anim="land" style="--d:3.5s"><span>Project A</span><span>#1</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:3.8s"><span>Project B</span><span>#2</span></div>
<h6>Glasshat audit</h6>
<div class="rk win" data-anim="land" style="--d:3.5s"><span>Glasshat</span><span>52.8</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:3.8s"><span>MeshSight</span><span>52.5</span></div>

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

There is a discrepancy between the hardcoded scores in this slide and the actual scores calculated from the real cohort data in SAMPLE_COHORT (apps/web/lib/sample-cohort.ts).

Specifically:

  • In SAMPLE_COHORT, Glasshat has an audited final score of 57.79 (rounds to 57.8) and MeshSight has 52.12 (rounds to 52.1).
  • Reconstructing their pre-audit scores using preAuditFinalScore yields 59.3 for Glasshat and 53.7 for MeshSight.
  • However, the slide hardcodes 54.3 -> 52.8 and 54.0 -> 52.5.

To ensure the cinematic deck is fully aligned with the actual live application data, we should update these values to match the real cohort scores.

Suggested change
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:2.8s"><span>Glasshat</span><span>54.3</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:3.0s"><span>MeshSight</span><span>54.0</span></div>
</div>
<div class="col">
<h6>with Glasshat audit</h6>
<div class="rk win" data-anim="land" style="--d:3.5s"><span>Project A</span><span>#1</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:3.8s"><span>Project B</span><span>#2</span></div>
<h6>Glasshat audit</h6>
<div class="rk win" data-anim="land" style="--d:3.5s"><span>Glasshat</span><span>52.8</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:3.8s"><span>MeshSight</span><span>52.5</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:2.8s"><span>Glasshat</span><span>59.3</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:3.0s"><span>MeshSight</span><span>53.7</span></div>
</div>
<div class="col">
<h6>Glasshat audit</h6>
<div class="rk win" data-anim="land" style="--d:3.5s"><span>Glasshat</span><span>57.8</span></div>
<div class="rk" data-anim="pop" style="--d:3.8s"><span>MeshSight</span><span>52.1</span></div>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant