Skip to content

Intro_to_slurm.md - #310

Open
Graviton28 wants to merge 1 commit into
UNM-CARC:masterfrom
Graviton28:pr/intro-to-slurm-easley
Open

Intro_to_slurm.md#310
Graviton28 wants to merge 1 commit into
UNM-CARC:masterfrom
Graviton28:pr/intro-to-slurm-easley

Conversation

@Graviton28

@Graviton28 Graviton28 commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ran sinfo and sinfo -N -l for real on easley to check this one, since it was never covered by the earlier campaign. checked the debug partition timelimit specifically since a sibling doc (Resource_usage.md) already caught a stale partition-limit claim elsewhere in this repo, but here the sample table's debug timelimit of 1:00:00 was already correct, same for every other partition (general/bigmem/h100/l40s/scavenger 2-00:00:00, interactive 4:00:00).

"key partitions" description said debug has a 4-hour limit while the sinfo table right above it showed 1:00:00, so the two contradicted each other. fixed the description to match.

also confirmed squeue --me and scancel --me are valid on the installed slurm 24.11.

… limit inconsistency

Ran sinfo and sinfo -N -l live on Easley. Specifically checked the debug
partition TIMELIMIT since a sibling doc (Resource_usage.md) previously found
a stale partition-limit claim on Hopper - but here the sinfo table's debug
TIMELIMIT of 1:00:00 was already correct. Refreshed the sample sinfo output
to current live node states while preserving all TIMELIMIT values (all
matched: general/bigmem/h100/l40s/scavenger 2-00:00:00, interactive
4:00:00, debug 1:00:00).

Found a real internal inconsistency instead: the "Key partitions" prose bullet
claimed debug had a "4-hour limit" while the table (correctly) showed
1:00:00. Fixed the prose to say 1-hour. Also confirmed squeue --me and
scancel --me are valid flags on the installed Slurm 24.11 via man pages and
a live squeue --me test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Graviton28
Graviton28 marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2026 04:53
@Graviton28
Graviton28 requested a review from gmfricke as a code owner August 4, 2026 04:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant