Skip to content

Initial batch. No functional changes other than a System.out to Logger.#1805

Open
MikeNeilson wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
task/fix-formatting-batch-1
Open

Initial batch. No functional changes other than a System.out to Logger.#1805
MikeNeilson wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
task/fix-formatting-batch-1

Conversation

@MikeNeilson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fix formatting according to Checkstyle results.

Related Issue

N/A

Validation

run ./gradlew checkstyleMain until no results for a file in the output. (with a few exception.)

Checklist

  • AI tools used

@MikeNeilson MikeNeilson force-pushed the task/fix-formatting-batch-1 branch from 5512197 to 4112f15 Compare June 25, 2026 17:58
@MikeNeilson MikeNeilson requested a review from krowvin June 25, 2026 17:58

@krowvin krowvin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would remove this package lock. I think it's a bit of leftover.

This is minor, just mentioning

I'm also seeing some trailing whitespace issues in

OfficeFormatV1.java
DateUtils.java
ResourceHelper.java

I thought we had a .gitattributes to help but I'm probably thinking of another repo

Comment thread cda-gui/package-lock.json

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should remove this because it does not appear the packages are also being updated. Even then it looks unrelated to the rest of your PR.

I suspect you had an old lock file and have not ran npm install in the CDA gui dir and this is resulting in a previous lock file trying to commit?

Comment on lines +55 to +56
public String getInstanceCharset() {
return instanceCharset;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are there tests this could break renaming the getter here?

Rest looks formatting related but this is an API change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants