Deposit identifiers from run 33693220802 (attempt 1) - #50
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Written by the deposit workflow (). The record id is the guard against ever minting a second DOI for these notes, so this has to reach the repository even if the run failed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Publication timestamps written by the deposit workflow (``).
Bookkeeping. The record id and DOI already reached
mainthrough the deposit request, so the guard against minting a second DOI is satisfied whether or not this lands; what is here isarchive_published_at, which only affects which notes a batch re-version offers.Merge it when convenient. It appears in the weekly outstanding issue until you do.
Underworld development team with AI support from Claude Code