Edited endnotes beside unchanged endnotes can still misbind in LibreOffice
Inherited, independently reproduced on main 9d82bab96ec3bd23c772a1bc2792cfbabc146652 and PR #994's updated reviewed head 40fc49a050aed0765bcdb8ad940534b68e7b5438. Not a regression of terminal cleanup or the aligned-footnote repair. The current reconciliation path is footnote-only; moved unchanged endnotes are covered, but edited endnotes alongside stable endnotes are not repaired.
Dynamic synthetic control: five aligned endnote anchors, first body edited. Current and independently extracted main source both produce anchor IDs [1,6,2,3,4,5]. Actual LibreOffice Accept/Reject dispatches on the unresolved comparison do not match independently imported revised/original identity controls: Accept binds anchor1 to stable body2 and anchor5 to the edited revised body; Reject also misbinds. Both projection parity checks are false on both versions. No private document or document upload.
Cause candidate: packages/docx-compare/src/tagged/pipeline.ts reconcileTaggedFootnotes is footnote-only; there is no corresponding endnote stabilization, so stabilizedNoteKinds never records an edited endnote and the coarse del(1)/ins(6) shape remains. This is a candidate bounded repair, not a measured Word policy.
Word Accept/Reject remains UNVERIFIED. Schema validity of these additional scratch probes was not adjudicated by this finding; do not call them schema-certified controls.
Public/synthetic-only local reproduction: /private/tmp/safe-docx-979-note-reader-20260917/.peer-review/probe/edge.probe.test.ts, 979-edge-head.log, 979-edge-main.log, and complete actual Opus5 review 979-integration-993-opus5-20260917.review.txt §5c/6a. Reviewer model/trace and exit0 collected by the supervisor. Ref: #979, #990, #992, PR #994.
Edited endnotes beside unchanged endnotes can still misbind in LibreOffice
Inherited, independently reproduced on main
9d82bab96ec3bd23c772a1bc2792cfbabc146652and PR #994's updated reviewed head40fc49a050aed0765bcdb8ad940534b68e7b5438. Not a regression of terminal cleanup or the aligned-footnote repair. The current reconciliation path is footnote-only; moved unchanged endnotes are covered, but edited endnotes alongside stable endnotes are not repaired.Dynamic synthetic control: five aligned endnote anchors, first body edited. Current and independently extracted main source both produce anchor IDs
[1,6,2,3,4,5]. Actual LibreOffice Accept/Reject dispatches on the unresolved comparison do not match independently imported revised/original identity controls: Accept binds anchor1 to stable body2 and anchor5 to the edited revised body; Reject also misbinds. Both projection parity checks are false on both versions. No private document or document upload.Cause candidate:
packages/docx-compare/src/tagged/pipeline.tsreconcileTaggedFootnotesis footnote-only; there is no corresponding endnote stabilization, sostabilizedNoteKindsnever records an edited endnote and the coarse del(1)/ins(6) shape remains. This is a candidate bounded repair, not a measured Word policy.Word Accept/Reject remains UNVERIFIED. Schema validity of these additional scratch probes was not adjudicated by this finding; do not call them schema-certified controls.
Public/synthetic-only local reproduction:
/private/tmp/safe-docx-979-note-reader-20260917/.peer-review/probe/edge.probe.test.ts,979-edge-head.log,979-edge-main.log, and complete actual Opus5 review979-integration-993-opus5-20260917.review.txt§5c/6a. Reviewer model/trace and exit0 collected by the supervisor. Ref: #979, #990, #992, PR #994.