Skip to content

Legal: counsel review — ODbL share-alike boundary + topic copy strategy #8

Description

@espi

Needs counsel sign-off before commercial release built on the Marble data.

Two questions from 04-law-ip.md, Q4.1:

  1. Validate the working reading: app experiences are ODbL "produced works" (attribution only); our overlay corrections to Marble records are potentially conveyable derivative-database content; our independent calibration data, kept structurally separate, is not.
  2. Parent-facing topic copy: reuse Marble's description/evidence text (CC-BY-SA obligations, attribution UI) vs. rewrite in our own voice (clean, but ~1,590 topics of copywriting). Decide per surface.

Attribution notice should ship in the app footer regardless (text in vendor/os-taxonomy/README.md).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions