🗳️ Censored addendum on Proxy Voting Flaws#58
Merged
Conversation
Merged
Member
Author
|
Important What file number was this submitted on back in '23? |
Member
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

This PR is a coalescence of strategies, which are more thoroughly discussed in the cited thread, offline communications, and call documented at JFWooten4#4 (comment)
I believe we can put them into a string bind by calling out the ignorance of this thorough comment, given nonsense on WhyDRS/FOIA-tracker#1. I'd like to work in @jackofspades71's redacted voting remarks, which they will not be able to hold back as an appendix. That'll give us a clean page cite on a SEC URL going forward, and I can work it into the voluminous other publication arguments which surround self-regulation in the letter.
For the actual appendix of this current comment, the link in note 12 stopped working and may need an archive. There is also a small typo of two periods in n.14. There are a lot of points, like the empty voting, that relate directly to CAT order lifecycle reconstructions.
I've said it before, but this is a really great comment, Jack. The Erik Sirri speech is unbelievably damning, and it sets up the 2016-17 proxy roundtable chatter. I would be most thankful to extend it in my next comment.