chore: add LICENSE (MIT OR Apache-2.0) (V2-672) - #13
Merged
Conversation
ant-webex was a public, store-published repo with no LICENSE file, so GitHub read it as all-rights-reserved. Dual-license MIT OR Apache-2.0 to match the org (ant-client, ant-node, indelible, ant-sdk all do this; LICENSE text copied verbatim from ant-client, "Copyright (c) 2026 Autonomi"). - LICENSE-MIT + LICENSE-APACHE at repo root - README "## License" → "Licensed under either of … at your option" (was "MIT") - package.json "license": "MIT OR Apache-2.0" (was absent) Matters for AMO especially, whose source review reads this repo directly. Closes V2-672. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
ant-webexwas a public, store-published repo with no LICENSE file — GitHub read it as all-rights-reserved. This dual-licenses it MIT OR Apache-2.0, matching the rest of the org (ant-client, ant-node, indelible, ant-sdk all do this).LICENSE-MIT+LICENSE-APACHEat repo root — copied verbatim from ant-client (Copyright (c) 2026 Autonomi)## License→ "Licensed under either of … at your option" (was just "MIT")package.json→"license": "MIT OR Apache-2.0"(was absent)Why now
Entirely first-party TypeScript — no third-party bundled code or installer EULA to reconcile (unlike ant-sdk #217). Matters for AMO especially, whose source review reads this repo directly, where an unlicensed source drop is a bad look.
Closes V2-672.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code