Skip to content

chore: bump Go 1.25.12 -> 1.25.13 + x/net v0.55.0 (govulncheck) - #159

Merged
Nic-dorman merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/bump-go1.25.13-xnet0.55.0
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

chore: bump Go 1.25.12 -> 1.25.13 + x/net v0.55.0 (govulncheck)#159
Nic-dorman merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/bump-go1.25.13-xnet0.55.0

Conversation

@Nic-dorman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

  • go.mod go directive: 1.25.12 → 1.25.13 (CI installs from this via go-version-file)
  • golang.org/x/net (indirect): v0.53.0 → v0.55.0 (x/text and x/tools move as its deps)

Why

Go 1.25.13 shipped security fixes and six advisories now flag master's build with reachable call paths, so Security Scanning's govulncheck step fails every master push (first tripped by #157's merge run — same time-triggered pattern as the nanoid advisory, unrelated to that PR's content):

Verification

  • GOTOOLCHAIN=go1.25.13 govulncheck ./...0 affecting vulnerabilities (replicates CI, which resolves the toolchain from go.mod; a plain local run scans the dev toolchain's stdlib instead and still reports the 1.26.5-line findings, fixed separately in 1.26.6)
  • npm audit --omit=dev --audit-level=high in web/ — 0 vulnerabilities
  • Full go test ./... under go1.25.13 — all packages pass
  • go build ./... — clean

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…heck)

Go 1.25.13 shipped security fixes; six advisories with reachable call
paths now flag the 1.25.12 stdlib (GO-2026-6218 net/url, GO-2026-6091
html/template, GO-2026-6090 crypto/tls, GO-2026-6089 net/http,
GO-2026-5972 encoding/asn1) plus GO-2026-5026 in x/net's idna. CI reads
the toolchain from go.mod, so every master push fails Security Scanning
until the directive moves.

Verified with GOTOOLCHAIN=go1.25.13 govulncheck ./... -> 0 affecting
vulnerabilities; full test suite green under the same toolchain.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Nic-dorman
Nic-dorman merged commit 4d26a4d into master Aug 17, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant