Skip to content
View Yuchi-Wang02's full-sized avatar

Block or report Yuchi-Wang02

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Content in all repositories owned by your account will be closed.
Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
Yuchi-Wang02/README.md

Yuchi Wang

Business analytics, customer workflows and AI evaluation

I'm an M.S. student in Business Analytics and Artificial Intelligence at Johns Hopkins Carey Business School (expected August 2027). I graduated cum laude from Ohio State, with a background in accounting and logistics management.

My projects connect business analysis with AI: checking claims against source data, evaluating model limitations and developing traceable customer workflows. My experience includes consumer insights at Ipsos, supply chain analysis at SF Express, and international student onboarding as an Ohio State Peer Advisor.

Washington, DC · Resume (PDF) · LinkedIn · Email · Hugging Face

Selected projects

CSM Copilot · Customer onboarding and technical handoffs

An AI-assisted prototype that separates missing onboarding evidence from failed checks, then prepares bilingual follow-ups and traceable technical handoffs. The workflow covers five synthetic accounts, six app/platform integrations and eight MCP tools. The browser demo replays saved outputs; it does not establish customer impact.

Interactive demo · Code and contribution statement · Evaluation

BizHallu · Checking AI-generated business claims

A correct amount can still support an incorrect claim. This workflow connects retail transactions, 100 reproducible business questions and local model answers. One inspectable case pairs the correct amount with rank 3 when the displayed evidence places the product seventh. The evaluation uses provisional, AI-assisted labels without independent human annotation.

Inspect the ranking error · Methods and results · Code

See the example: the same amount, a different rank

April 2011: the model gives rank 3 while the source evidence gives rank 7 for the same product and GBP 4,173.18. Curated evidence check.

DelaySentinel · Logistics data and model evaluation

An audit of a published Llama fine-tune identifies label leakage behind a perfect historical test score, using simple baselines, feature ablations and behavioral probes. A separate classical-model study evaluates checkout-time information on 37,702 later Olist orders. Both studies are retrospective evaluations.

Case study · Olist study · Code

Rebalance Lab · Financial analysis and model validation

A sector-ETF study of trading costs, calendar sensitivity and accounting reconciliation. Comparing six semiannual calendars and four cost scenarios shows how assumptions can change the conclusion. The repository includes saved results, paired uncertainty estimates and a dated record of my transaction-level accounting checks.

Research site · Code and validation memo · Personal review record

Additional research: Jev Scope Challenge explores evidence ownership, rule-grounded decisions and model-evaluation limitations.

How I work

These personal projects use substantial AI assistance for implementation and review. The repositories document methods, saved evidence, personal contributions and limitations. My focus is on understanding the business question and checking what the results actually support.

Resume updated October 15, 2026.

Pinned Loading

  1. csm-copilot csm-copilot Public

    Evidence-grounded customer onboarding MCP server. Bilingual follow-ups, traceable handoffs, interactive case explorer, and reproducible evaluations.

    Python

  2. bizhallu bizhallu Public

    Exploring whether AI-generated retail claims are supported by source data, with reproducible questions and interactive cases.

    Python 1

  3. delaysentinel delaysentinel Public

    A published Llama fine-tune scores 100% on its historical split. The audit shows why: a depth-2 tree ties it, a two-field rule reproduces all 1,000 labels, and one unrelated note flips 84 of 84 neg…

    Python 1

  4. rebalance-lab rebalance-lab Public

    A validation study of momentum rebalancing: calendar sensitivity, trading costs, paired uncertainty and reproducible accounting checks.

    Jupyter Notebook