Repository navigation
About copy edits from Michael (2026-10-15) - #181
Merged
Merged
Conversation
zzthis.com card "For business uses: companies, ..."; founder title "business models" (plural); founder bio names the 2003 patent application and expands the 2001 filing sentence; Hacker Dojo "Many of us met at"; location "Silicon Valley (Santa Clara) and New York City." Home hero sub-headline now ends "just like the start and end bars on a barcode and the three corner squares on a QR code." Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016ZYdSC2Qomx979pDmU5GAS
…nt" [MICHAEL 2026-10-15] Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016ZYdSC2Qomx979pDmU5GAS
…[MICHAEL 2026-10-15] New heading, subtitle "Innovation | Community | Networking", two paragraphs, a lead line and a seven-item skills list (two columns from 48rem, one on phones), as Michael gave them. Body text in this section moves from --text-md (1.25rem) to --text-base (1.0625rem), 85 percent, the requested ~15 percent reduction; no new value introduced. Heading, subtitle, spacing and colors unchanged. No visible Hacker Dojo reference remains in the section. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016ZYdSC2Qomx979pDmU5GAS
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 07e431be21
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Applies Danny's 3-commit format-patch series (authorship kept, applied cleanly on main d041b47, no conflicts):
Local: site tests 362/362 + 244/244 pass; astro build OK (Node 22). One workers/api test (audit.test.ts limit) failed locally; that worker isn't touched by this patch.