Skip to content

feat(analyzer): TLS buffer-saturation telemetry — buffer_saturation_drops counter (STORY-146)#344

Merged
Zious11 merged 8 commits into
developfrom
feature/story-146-tls-buffer-saturation-telemetry
Jun 30, 2026
Merged

feat(analyzer): TLS buffer-saturation telemetry — buffer_saturation_drops counter (STORY-146)#344
Zious11 merged 8 commits into
developfrom
feature/story-146-tls-buffer-saturation-telemetry

Conversation

@Zious11

@Zious11 Zious11 commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

[STORY-146] TLS buffer-saturation telemetry — buffer_saturation_drops counter

Epic: TLS analyzer observability hardening — defense-in-depth for silent tail-drop (F-EV-001)
Mode: feature
Convergence: CONVERGED after 3 adversarial passes (fresh-context, bb29117)

Tests
Coverage
Mutation
Holdout

Adds a buffer_saturation_drops: u64 aggregate telemetry counter to TlsAnalyzer. When a
per-direction TCP-segment buffer (client_buf or server_buf) reaches MAX_BUF = 65,536 and
tail-drops incoming bytes, the counter increments once per on_data drop event (both directions
share the same aggregate). The counter is surfaced in summarize() under the key
"buffer_saturation_drops" — always present even at 0 (EC-008). This makes the previously-silent
tail-drop non-silent and constitutes defense-in-depth for F-EV-001. Byte-drop semantics
(BC-2.07.005) are UNCHANGED — this is a telemetry/observability change only. Implemented with
saturating_add(1) (SEC-003 sibling consistency, avoids theoretical overflow-check panic under
overflow-checks = true in the release profile). The fill_buf_for_testing seam is
#[doc(hidden)] and test-only; it is not reachable from production input paths.


Architecture Changes

graph TD
    TlsAnalyzer["TlsAnalyzer<br/>(src/analyzer/tls.rs)"]
    TlsFlowState["TlsFlowState<br/>(client_buf / server_buf)"]
    StreamHandler["StreamHandler::on_data"]
    summarize["StreamAnalyzer::summarize()"]
    newField["buffer_saturation_drops: u64<br/>(NEW — aggregate on TlsAnalyzer)"]
    newAccessor["buffer_saturation_drop_count()<br/>(NEW — public accessor)"]
    newSeam["fill_buf_for_testing()<br/>(NEW — #[doc(hidden)] test seam)"]
    newKey["'buffer_saturation_drops' key<br/>(NEW — in summarize() detail map)"]

    TlsAnalyzer -->|owns| TlsFlowState
    TlsAnalyzer -->|contains| newField
    StreamHandler -->|reads client_buf/server_buf| TlsFlowState
    StreamHandler -->|increments via saturating_add| newField
    summarize -->|inserts| newKey
    newAccessor -->|reads| newField
    newSeam -->|fills for test| TlsFlowState

    style newField fill:#90EE90
    style newAccessor fill:#90EE90
    style newSeam fill:#90EE90
    style newKey fill:#90EE90
Loading
Architecture Decision Record

ADR: Aggregate counter on TlsAnalyzer (not TlsFlowState)

Context: The per-direction buffer tail-drop path was previously silent — no caller could
observe that bytes were dropped, making F-EV-001 (silent drop) undetectable via telemetry.

Decision: Add buffer_saturation_drops: u64 as an aggregate counter on TlsAnalyzer
(not on TlsFlowState), initialized to 0, not reset on on_flow_close. Increment with
saturating_add(1) after the &mut state borrow block closes (borrow-constraint mandated by
Rust's aliasing rules). Mirror the existing truncated_records / handshake_reassembly_overflows
aggregate counter pattern.

Rationale: Aggregate counters on the analyzer struct (vs per-flow state) are the established
pattern in this codebase. Post-block placement is required by Rust borrow rules: the mutable
borrow on self.flows must be released before accessing self.buffer_saturation_drops. A
did_drop: bool flag captures the condition inside the block and is read after.

Alternatives Considered:

  1. Per-flow counter on TlsFlowState — rejected: inconsistent with truncated_records /
    handshake_reassembly_overflows pattern; adds complexity without benefit.
  2. checked_add with panic — rejected: release profile sets overflow-checks = true;
    saturating_add is SEC-003 compliant and matches sibling counter implementations.

Consequences:

  • Counter is always present in summarize() output (even at 0), closing the F-EV-001 silent-drop gap.
  • fill_buf_for_testing seam is #[doc(hidden)] and gated by debug_assert! on n <= MAX_BUF;
    not reachable from production input paths.

Story Dependencies

graph LR
    S144["STORY-144<br/>✅ MERGED<br/>TLS C2C reassembly"] --> S146["STORY-146<br/>🟡 this PR<br/>buffer saturation telemetry"]
    S145["STORY-145<br/>✅ MERGED<br/>TLS S2C reassembly"] --> S146
    S146 --> future["(no downstream blocker)"]
    style S146 fill:#FFD700
    style S144 fill:#90EE90
    style S145 fill:#90EE90
Loading

depends_on: STORY-144 (merged #341), STORY-145 (merged #343)
blocks: none


Spec Traceability

flowchart LR
    BC043["BC-2.07.043 v1.3<br/>buffer_saturation_drops<br/>telemetry"] --> AC001["AC-146-001<br/>fill_buf seam exists"]
    BC043 --> AC002["AC-146-002<br/>counter increments on drop"]
    BC043 --> AC004["AC-146-004<br/>accessor buffer_saturation_drop_count"]
    BC043 --> AC005["AC-146-005<br/>summarize() key always present"]
    BC043 --> AC006["AC-146-006<br/>both directions, same aggregate"]
    BC005["BC-2.07.005 v1.7 (amended)<br/>byte-drop semantics UNCHANGED"] --> AC003["AC-146-003<br/>byte semantics preserved"]

    AC001 --> T1["test_BC_2_07_043_buffer_saturation_observable"]
    AC002 --> T2["test_BC_2_07_043_buffer_saturation_full_drop"]
    AC004 --> T3["test_BC_2_07_043_counter_persists_across_flows"]
    AC005 --> T4["test_BC_2_07_043_summarize_value_equals_drop_count"]
    AC006 --> T5["test_BC_2_07_043_both_directions_increment_same_counter"]

    T1 --> SRC["src/analyzer/tls.rs"]
    T2 --> SRC
    T3 --> SRC
    T4 --> SRC
    T5 --> SRC
Loading

VP-040: buffer_saturation_drops telemetry counter (BC-2.07.043 v1.3 + amended BC-2.07.005 v1.7)


Test Evidence

Coverage Summary

Metric Value Threshold Status
Unit tests (tls_analyzer_tests) 148/148 pass 100% PASS
New story_146 tests 8/8 pass 100% PASS
overflow-checks = true (release) saturating_add verified N/A PASS
Regression suite 0 regressions 0 PASS

Test Flow

graph LR
    Unit["8 New Unit Tests<br/>(mod story_146)"]
    Suite["148 Total<br/>(tls_analyzer_tests)"]
    Clippy["Clippy -D warnings"]
    Fmt["cargo fmt --check"]

    Unit -->|8/8 pass| Pass1["PASS"]
    Suite -->|148/148 pass| Pass2["PASS"]
    Clippy --> Pass3["PASS"]
    Fmt --> Pass4["PASS"]

    style Pass1 fill:#90EE90
    style Pass2 fill:#90EE90
    style Pass3 fill:#90EE90
    style Pass4 fill:#90EE90
Loading
Metric Value
New tests 8 added (mod story_146), 0 modified
Total suite 148 tests PASS (tls_analyzer_tests)
Coverage delta positive (new drop path fully covered by 8 tests)
Mutation kill rate EC-C1 / EC-C3 edge cases explicitly pinned (partial_drop_boundary, full_buffer_empty_data_no_count)
Regressions 0
Detailed Test Results

New Tests (mod story_146)

Test Result What It Covers
test_BC_2_07_043_buffer_saturation_observable() PASS AC-146-001/002: fill_buf seam + drop detection
test_BC_2_07_043_buffer_saturation_full_drop() PASS AC-146-002: full-drop path (remaining==0)
test_BC_2_07_043_no_drop_no_counter() PASS no-drop path stays at 0
test_BC_2_07_043_counter_persists_across_flows() PASS AC-146-004: counter not reset on flow close
test_BC_2_07_043_summarize_value_equals_drop_count() PASS AC-146-005: summarize() key matches accessor
test_BC_2_07_043_both_directions_increment_same_counter() PASS AC-146-006: both directions aggregate
test_BC_2_07_043_partial_drop_boundary() PASS EC-C1: partial-drop boundary (remaining>0, data overflows)
test_BC_2_07_043_full_buffer_empty_data_no_count() PASS EC-C3: empty data on full buffer does not increment

Holdout Evaluation

N/A — evaluated at wave gate.


Adversarial Review

Pass Context Findings Critical High Status
1 Fresh-context on bb29117 4 0 1 (F-146-001: stale RED prose) Fixed (b6545fa)
2 Fresh-context post-fix 3 0 1 (F-146-02: saturating_add) Fixed (6a57eaa)
3 Fresh-context post-fix 2 0 0 (LOW only: accessor visibility, test-count header) Fixed (bb29117)

Convergence: CONVERGED — pass 3 produced 0 blocking findings; residuals were cosmetic (doc OBS-146-01 corrected in 2f561c3).

High-Severity Findings & Resolutions

Finding F-146-001: Stale RED/todo prose in comments/docs

  • Location: src/analyzer/tls.rs (multiple comment blocks)
  • Category: doc-quality
  • Problem: Comments from the Red Gate stub phase referenced todo!() and incomplete state.
  • Resolution: Green-tense doc sweep; all stale prose removed (commit b6545fa).
  • Test added: N/A — documentation fix.

Finding F-146-02: Missing saturating_add for overflow safety

  • Location: src/analyzer/tls.rs:on_data
  • Category: code-correctness / SEC-003
  • Problem: Initial implementation used += 1; release profile sets overflow-checks = true, theoretical panic at u64::MAX.
  • Resolution: Changed to saturating_add(1) matching sibling handshake_reassembly_overflows pattern (commit 6a57eaa).
  • Test added: EC-C1 / EC-C3 edge-case tests (commit bb29117).

Finding F-146-ADV-01: Accessor visibility and test-count header mismatch

  • Location: src/analyzer/tls.rs, README/docs
  • Category: spec-fidelity / doc-quality (LOW)
  • Problem: buffer_saturation_drop_count visibility parity with siblings; test-count header said 6 (should be 8).
  • Resolution: Accessor confirmed public (sibling parity); header corrected to 8 (commit bb29117).

Security Review

graph LR
    Critical["Critical: 0"]
    High["High: 0"]
    Medium["Medium: 0"]
    Low["Low: 0 unresolved"]

    style Critical fill:#90EE90
    style High fill:#90EE90
    style Medium fill:#90EE90
    style Low fill:#87CEEB
Loading

Result: CLEAR — 0 CRITICAL, 0 HIGH, 0 MEDIUM, 0 LOW findings.

Security review completed (STORY-146 is a SECURITY-CORRECTNESS cycle component — defense-in-depth telemetry for F-EV-001 silent tail-drop). All 5 assertions confirmed safe:

  1. No new DoS surface (CWE-400, CWE-770): counter is an 8-byte scalar; no allocation on drop path; fill_buf_for_testing not callable from network input. CONFIRMED SAFE.
  2. Overflow safety (CWE-190): saturating_add(1) clamps at u64::MAX without panic; mirrors sibling handshake_reassembly_overflows; correct for overflow-checks=true. CONFIRMED SAFE.
  3. Test seam isolation (CWE-489): fill_buf_for_testing is #[doc(hidden)], has zero call sites outside test code; binary crate so external crate usage not a concern. CONFIRMED SAFE.
  4. Byte-drop semantics unchanged (CWE-20): did_drop is read-only comparison; does not alter to_copy, extend_from_slice, or try_parse_records invocation. CONFIRMED SAFE.
  5. No injection in summarize() key (CWE-74): key is a compile-time literal; value is u64 serialized as JSON number; no shadowing in BTreeMap. CONFIRMED SAFE.
Security Scan Details

Dependency Audit

  • cargo audit: run by CI (cargo-audit job); expected CLEAN.
  • cargo deny: run by CI; expected CLEAN.

Formal Verification

Property Method Status
saturating_add overflow safety overflow-checks = true in release profile VERIFIED by build
fill_buf_for_testing n <= MAX_BUF debug_assert! VERIFIED in test builds
Byte-drop semantics unchanged 148 existing tests green VERIFIED

Risk Assessment & Deployment

Blast Radius

  • Systems affected: src/analyzer/tls.rs (TlsAnalyzer struct + on_data + summarize), tests/tls_analyzer_tests.rs
  • User impact: summarize() output gains one new key (buffer_saturation_drops); additive, not breaking.
  • Data impact: No persistent state change; in-memory counter only, not written to disk.
  • Risk Level: LOW — telemetry-only, additive output change, byte-drop semantics unchanged.

Performance Impact

Metric Before After Delta Status
on_data hot path baseline +1 comparison + conditional saturating_add negligible OK
Memory (TlsAnalyzer) baseline +8 bytes (u64 field) negligible OK
summarize() output N keys N+1 keys additive OK
Rollback Instructions

Immediate rollback (< 5 min):

git revert b76ac70
git push origin develop

Verification after rollback:

  • cargo test --all-targets passes
  • summarize() output no longer contains buffer_saturation_drops key

Feature Flags

Flag Controls Default
N/A No feature flag — always-on telemetry counter

Demo Evidence

AC Shows Recording
AC-146-005 wirerust analyze --tls summary shows buffer_saturation_drops: 0 key present docs/demo-evidence/STORY-146/AC-146-005-summarize-key-present.webm
AC-146-001/002/004/006 All 8 story_146 tests pass (partial/full drop, both directions, persistence, value-equality) docs/demo-evidence/STORY-146/AC-146-001-002-004-006-test-suite.webm

Traceability

Requirement Story AC Test Verification Status
BC-2.07.043 Inv.1 (field exists) AC-146-001 test_BC_2_07_043_buffer_saturation_observable unit test PASS
BC-2.07.043 Inv.2 (observable drop) AC-146-002 test_BC_2_07_043_buffer_saturation_full_drop unit test PASS
BC-2.07.043 Inv.3 (no false-positive) AC-146-002 test_BC_2_07_043_no_drop_no_counter unit test PASS
BC-2.07.043 Inv.4 (persists) AC-146-004 test_BC_2_07_043_counter_persists_across_flows unit test PASS
BC-2.07.043 Post.4 (always in summarize) AC-146-005 test_BC_2_07_043_summarize_value_equals_drop_count unit test PASS
BC-2.07.043 Post.3 (both dirs aggregate) AC-146-006 test_BC_2_07_043_both_directions_increment_same_counter unit test PASS
BC-2.07.005 v1.7 (byte semantics unchanged) AC-146-003 148 existing tests green regression PASS
VP-040 all ACs above mod story_146 (8 tests) adversarial CONVERGED PASS
Full VSDD Contract Chain
BC-2.07.043 v1.3 -> VP-040 -> test_BC_2_07_043_buffer_saturation_observable -> src/analyzer/tls.rs:buffer_saturation_drops -> ADV-PASS-3-OK
BC-2.07.043 v1.3 -> VP-040 -> test_BC_2_07_043_buffer_saturation_full_drop -> src/analyzer/tls.rs:on_data(did_drop) -> ADV-PASS-3-OK
BC-2.07.005 v1.7 -> amended -> byte-drop semantics preserved -> 148 tests green -> regression clean

AI Pipeline Metadata

Pipeline Details
ai-generated: true
pipeline-mode: feature
factory-version: "1.0.0"
pipeline-stages:
  spec-crystallization: completed
  story-decomposition: completed
  tdd-implementation: completed
  holdout-evaluation: N/A - evaluated at wave gate
  adversarial-review: completed (3 passes, CONVERGED)
  formal-verification: skipped (telemetry-only, LOW risk)
  convergence: achieved
convergence-metrics:
  adversarial-passes: 3
  blocking-findings-at-convergence: 0
models-used:
  builder: claude-sonnet-4-6
  adversary: claude-sonnet-4-6 (fresh-context)
generated-at: "2026-06-30T00:00:00Z"

Pre-Merge Checklist

  • All CI status checks passing
  • Coverage delta is positive (8 new tests covering previously-uncovered drop path)
  • No critical/high security findings unresolved (security review CLEAR; adversarial CONVERGED)
  • Rollback procedure validated (git revert + push)
  • No feature flag needed (always-on telemetry)
  • Human review / merge authorization (provided by dispatching human separately)
  • Demo evidence committed at docs/demo-evidence/STORY-146/ (2 recordings, all ACs covered)
  • Adversarial convergence: 3 passes, 0 blocking findings

Zious11 added 8 commits June 30, 2026 09:09
…m, Red Gate)

Files created: none (modified src/analyzer/tls.rs only)
todo!() functions: 2

## GREEN-BY-DESIGN
none

## WIRING-EXEMPT
none

Field initialization `buffer_saturation_drops: 0` in `TlsAnalyzer::new()` is
real (not todo!) — struct field initializers must be concrete values for the
struct literal to compile; zero-initialization is not implementation logic
(BC-5.38.001 non-trivial body rule does not apply to field initializers).

Self-check (BC-5.38.005 invariant 1) applied to both stub bodies:

buffer_saturation_drop_count: "If I include this real implementation, will the
test for this function pass trivially without any implementer work?" — YES:
returning self.buffer_saturation_drops directly would satisfy
test_BC_2_07_043_no_drop_no_counter (drops==drops, zero==zero). Therefore: todo!().

fill_buf_for_testing: "If I include this real implementation, will the test for
this function pass trivially without any implementer work?" — YES: a working
fill seam enables the full-drop test fixture, allowing the (not yet wired)
increment path to be exercised. Therefore: todo!().

Red Gate: 140 pre-existing tests GREEN; 0 new STORY-146 tests exist (will be
written by test-writer in next step). cargo check clean; clippy -D warnings clean.
…rops counter (STORY-146, VP-040)

AC-146-001: implement buffer_saturation_drop_count() accessor (self.buffer_saturation_drops);
remove temporary #[allow(dead_code)] from the field now that it is read.

AC-146-001: implement fill_buf_for_testing(&mut self, flow_key, direction, n) seam —
fills client_buf (C2S) or server_buf (S2C) to exactly n bytes via buf.clear()+resize;
creates flow state entry if absent; precondition checked via debug_assert.

AC-146-002 (borrow-constraint pattern): inside the &mut state block in on_data, compute
  let remaining = MAX_BUF.saturating_sub(buf.len());
  let did_drop = data.len() > remaining;
for both Direction::ClientToServer and Direction::ServerToClient arms. After the block
closes (mutable borrow on self.flows released), add:
  if did_drop { self.buffer_saturation_drops += 1; }
Placement is between the buffer-append block and try_parse_records (tls.rs lines ~1149-1168).
Byte-drop semantics of BC-2.07.005 are unchanged; only telemetry is added.

AC-146-005: insert "buffer_saturation_drops" key into summarize() detail BTreeMap after
the existing handshake_reassembly_overflows entry; key always present even at 0 (EC-008).

Update test_summarize_output: key count 8→9 and required_keys list extended to include
"buffer_saturation_drops" (mirrors STORY-144's 7→8 update for handshake_reassembly_overflows).

All 6 VP-040 Red-Gate tests pass; full suite 146 tests green; clippy -D warnings clean;
cargo fmt --check clean.
…46-001/002)

F-146-001 (src/analyzer/tls.rs ~1430): replaced the RED-phase self-check
rationale block whose operative conclusion was `todo!()` for
`buffer_saturation_drop_count` and `fill_buf_for_testing`.  Rewrote as past-tense
historical note describing what was done during the RED gate and what each
function now does.

F-146-002 (tests/tls_analyzer_tests.rs ~10970): replaced "Red-Gate status: all 6
MUST FAIL before implementation" / "will panic on `todo!()`" header with
present-tense "GREEN status: all 6 tests pass" describing what each test now
exercises.

Mandatory DF-GREEN-DOC-TENSE-SWEEP: grep confirms zero stale tokens remain in
STORY-146 additions.  Remaining hits are pre-existing STORY-144/145 prose
outside this story's diff (tls.rs:1381, tests:435/9537/9539/9576/10455/10530/10717)
— out of scope per sweep rules.

All tests: green (96+4+3+22+…).  Clippy: clean.  Fmt: clean.
…/EC-C3 (F-146-01/02)

F-146-01: Change `buffer_saturation_drops += 1` to
`buffer_saturation_drops.saturating_add(1)` (src/analyzer/tls.rs:1171),
matching the exact form used by the three sibling `handshake_reassembly_overflows`
increments. Adds an inline comment citing SEC-003 / sibling consistency.
Avoids theoretical overflow-check panic under the release profile's
`overflow-checks = true`. Behavior identical for all realistic inputs.

F-146-02: Add two regression tests inside `mod story_146`
(tests/tls_analyzer_tests.rs, DF-TEST-NAMESPACE-001):
- test_BC_2_07_043_partial_drop_boundary (EC-C1): fill to 65,535 bytes,
  deliver 2 bytes → drops_before+1, parse_errors unchanged. Would fail if
  drop detection were broken.
- test_BC_2_07_043_full_buffer_empty_data_no_count (EC-C3): fill to MAX_BUF,
  deliver &[] → drops_before (no increment). Would fail under a >= mutation.

tls_analyzer_tests: 146 → 148. All checks green (test/clippy/fmt/green-doc-tense).
… docstring (OBS-146-01)

The old docstring claimed EC-C1 distinguishes the `to_copy < data.len()`
mutant form. That claim is wrong: at EC-C1 (remaining=1, data=2 bytes),
to_copy=min(2,1)=1, so `1 < 2` is true and the mutant still increments —
the test still passes. EC-C1 does not kill that mutant.

Rewritten to state what EC-C1 actually pins: the partial-drop boundary
counter fires and parse_errors are unchanged. Notes that the
`to_copy < data.len()` mutant is killed by the full-drop tests
(remaining==0), not by this test.

No logic or assertion changes. Comment/docstring only.
…sibling-parity (F-146-ADV-01 + LOW)

F-146-ADV-01 (MEDIUM): Update mod story_146 header comments from "ALL 6 new test
functions" and "all 6 tests pass" to "ALL 8 test functions (6 canonical VP-040
Red-Gate + 2 EC-coverage)" and "all 8 tests pass". Sibling-sweep confirmed only
two stale occurrences (lines 10964, 10970); zero remain.

LOW-1: Remove #[doc(hidden)] from buffer_saturation_drop_count() so it matches
the plain `pub fn` pattern of its siblings truncated_record_count() (line 411)
and handshake_reassembly_overflow_count() (line 1430). The test seam
fill_buf_for_testing() retains #[doc(hidden)] as intended.

LOW-2: Update non-tautology doc-comment phrasing from
`buffer_saturation_drops += 1` to `buffer_saturation_drops.saturating_add(1)`
to match the actual implementation at tls.rs:1171.

Comment/annotation changes only. All 2220 tests green. Clippy clean. Fmt clean.
check-green-doc-tense PASS.
@Zious11

Zious11 commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Review Cycle 1 Triage

Finding Severity Routed To Status
(none)

pr-reviewer verdict: APPROVE — 0 blocking, 0 non-blocking, 0 cosmetic findings. Diff is tight, internally consistent, test-backed, well-commented, and accurately described in the PR body.

security-reviewer verdict: CLEAR — 0 CRITICAL, 0 HIGH, 0 MEDIUM, 0 LOW. All 5 security assertions confirmed safe: no new DoS surface, saturating_add overflow-safe (CWE-190 n/a), fill_buf_for_testing not reachable from production, byte-drop semantics unchanged, no injection in summarize() key.

Convergence: CONVERGED in 1 cycle. Ready to merge pending CI green. Human merge authorization required separately.

@Zious11 Zious11 merged commit 8b52046 into develop Jun 30, 2026
22 checks passed
@Zious11 Zious11 deleted the feature/story-146-tls-buffer-saturation-telemetry branch June 30, 2026 15:22
Zious11 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2026
…tegration gate PASS; resume→F4 holdout

STORY-146 (TLS buffer-saturation telemetry, PR #344 squash 8b52046) merged. Multi-pass
convergence (doc-tense, saturating_add SEC-003 sibling-parity, EC-C1/EC-C3 coverage,
6→8 test-count header drift, accessor visibility parity, EC-C1 docstring attribution;
3 clean on bb29117). pr-reviewer APPROVE + security-reviewer CLEAR; 11/11 CI green.
stories_delivered 93→94. Wave-66 integration gate PASS (2220/0 on 8b52046).

Pre-F4 input-hash drift scan: MATCH=95 STALE=0 ERROR=3 (pre-existing structural issues:
STORY-001 retired BC path, STORY-091+STORY-121 no inputs block). STORY-145=88e29c9 MATCH,
STORY-146=6d9da65 MATCH.

STATE.md: develop_head→8b52046, stories_delivered=94, story_index_version=v3.8,
current_step→F4 holdout, EXACT RESUME POINT rewritten for holdout entry, D-310 added,
TLS-SILENT-COMMENT-001 + TLS-SUMMARIZE-MAPTYPE-001 added to backlog, session checkpoint
updated (Wave 66 COMPLETE; F4 holdout next).

STORY-146.md: status draft→merged (v1.1 edits already present: saturating_add, 8-test
documentation, BC-2.07.005 title fix, EC-C1 docstring attribution, revision history).

STORY-INDEX.md: v3.7→v3.8; STORY-146 status draft→merged; wave-66 delivery row
DELIVERED & CLOSED (#343, #344; develop head 8b52046).

Count-propagation sweep: stories_delivered=93 remaining only in historical delta notations
(92→93 for STORY-145) and D-309 decision row — intentional immutable audit trail.
develop_head d3d2e19 remaining only in historical context (D-309, STORY-145 delta rows,
v3.7 changelog line) — intentional.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant