Repository navigation
docs: Finalize TypeScript skill 0.2.1 for published runtime 0.3.5 - #35
Conversation
Exact-candidate TS design/content review checkpointCorrelation: The TS project's fixed design record at 6fdf9d65fb0b62cca3801a3733af07add5fb6553 records conditional design/content acceptance of this complete candidate/profile for guard preparation. This is not final publication freeze, installation approval, or permission to merge/publish. Independently checked:
Next gates remain actual supporting runtime publication with exact source/artifact evidence, separately approved final skill wording and renewed exact-head/full-byte review, then skill publication and synchronized runtime guidance/PARITY pin adoption. Final wording will change the candidate hash; current bytes are not an installation/release pin. This checkpoint changes no source bytes, metadata, tags, published artifacts, installations or operations. No additional peer reply/reminder was sent. |
Exact renewed content-contract review checkpointCorrelation: The received TS review report accepts the design/content contract for this exact head Independently rechecked this head and exact downloaded files:
The final-artifact status wording finding is resolved: approved published immutable release/source/hash selection is time-neutral; temporary preparation status and old0.2.0 pin are dated history; tag-name/metadata/PR-head existence never proves publication or installation authorization. This is recorded as design/content acceptance, not a formal GitHub approving review, joint final publication freeze, human merge/tag/release authorization, pin promotion or installation/operations permission. Future SKILL-byte changes need renewed exact-content review. Source bytes, tags and published pins are unchanged by this checkpoint. Supporting runtime publication and exact-content review are complete, so the PR can enter normal current-head review. Human merge/release gates remain separate. No peer reply/reminder was sent for this checkpoint. |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a4c1d0c211
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Final current-head content/review checkpointExact head The received TS review report accepts the exact reader-amended content contract with no remaining normative findings. It reports direct public0.3.5 pure-validator/file inspection against these new bytes, while explicitly excluding installation, historical CLI qualification, instruction execution, child processes, native/model/delivery/ACK tests. These executions are the TS reviewer's reported validation, not independent runs here. Independently observed in GitHub: same-head CI2/2 SUCCESS and automatic Code+Security Review completed. No new review findings were submitted. The previous a4c1d0c P2 was addressed by the two active reader-version sentence updates and its fix reply; no reader guarantee/limit or metadata change. All publication-status/immutable-source and finite-profile boundaries remain. This is design/content review plus current-head automated review evidence, not formal human merge/tag/release approval or joint publication freeze. No source bytes, tags, pins, installations or operations were changed by this checkpoint. No additional peer reply/reminder was sent. |
|
Released after explicit user approval: PR35 MERGED at Canonical TS SKILL13,996rawUTF8bytes/SHA256 TS maintainer follow-up for four-language runtime guidance/PARITY adoption was sent once under correlation |
Refs #34. Ready for normal review after recorded exact-content acceptance; human merge/release approval remains separate. Supporting runtime publication is now verified; skill publication is still a separate gate.
Summary
Exact renewed bytes
Branch:
docs/ts-skill-0-2-1-candidateHead:
dc303b513d9da862f2ce21d648e168fdd847ae95Base:
eb239fb358336d85b49bab2c80e4ea39037d13748c3520f95e0d6807303be96bfa06df69887ddaf76be05f1905505d0a956820c3.89a053a50786a4802679bd88fcb96fff0706e3789739f6a2f63b5d74ecdd2de2.71a82e9d687efc9e07b550368a1e7aa95d28ff2365342a0d2dafa9ad4baa83bc.15378c6d503a69d1d738ac4739182e23257aa6f2f7fd31ef3fd2fa60e692867f.The previous9db5420 candidate13930bytes/SHA96d5a0... received conditional design/content acceptance, recorded in this checkpoint. Its wording changed after runtime publication, so that acceptance does not automatically freeze these renewed bytes. Current head is not an installation/release pin.
Supporting runtime publication evidence
46f4a01f9570034fca49cfa5fad620f3f45b5f33b1a6714f29ea0a3c1e751ac0and registry SHA-512 integrity.a2057940ba19056fcaaa5551a7820f7414bd3bfa, repository/main/workflow_dispatch/.github/workflows/publish.yml and run38380726060 were read and matched. This is payload/hash/source binding review; Sigstore/signature cryptographic verification and fresh publishing-policy settings audit were not independently run here.Validation and review limits
node scripts/validate-skill.mjs --tag session-peer-ts-v0.2.1andgit diff --check: PASS; tag-rule validation only, no tag created.Remaining gates
No merge, tag, skill/npm publication, user-installed skill/runtime update or operations change. Python snapshot and0.4 work stay separate.
Renewed time-neutral wording review
The preceding0fcdc63 full bytes received conditional exact-content acceptance from the TS reviewer, with one final-artifact status wording finding. This new head resolves that finding. Primary and separate read-only Codex review found no further issue; exact renewed bytes have not yet been accepted by the TS maintainer. No merge/tag/release/pin promotion occurred.
Current-head automatic review amendment
The a4c1d0c code review raised one P2: active SKILL/setup reader passages did not list0.3.5. Commitdc303b5 updates only those two sentences to include the actual public version; bounded/stability-check guarantees and all limits are unchanged. This changes whole SKILL bytes/hash, so previous exact-content acceptance is historical and renewed TS review is required. Fresh current-head CI2/2 passed; renewed code/security review completed on that same head with no new reported findings. The TS review report now accepts these exact renewed bytes/profile for design/content only; this does not authorize human merge, tags, publication, installation or pin promotion.