Open
Conversation
Update from upstream
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Adam,
I played with three modifications to the MCMC sampling:
For Rosenbrock it seems --num_blocks=5 --hidden_dim=40 --num_layers=1 works reliably in 2-20 dimensions. After a few sample-train iterations, the sampler becomes much more efficient than standard emcee (tested by setting num_blocks=1 num_layers=0).
For Himmelblau the sampler tends to lose modes. I think this is because I restart the sampler from scratch, but I should initialise it with the last sampler population (the reshape in my sample() flattens everything, I haven't figured out how to just return as is).
Later I want to look at nested sampling.
Cheers,
Johannes