Skip to content

Record verified native Codex MCP compatibility - #2

Merged
agammann merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
verify-native-host
Oct 2, 2026
Merged

agammann merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
verify-native-host

Conversation

@agammann

@agammann agammann commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The compatibility docs still marked Codex as unverified after the live host checks completed. Update the README and verification records with the native Codex 0.159.2 OAuth/MCP results against the public Sites app, including all seven tools, saved revisions, pinned handoffs, idempotent retries and conflict rejection. Add the verified external-browser route for physical security keys.

Validation: assertions over the actual host responses passed; Chrome showed revision 3 and both handoffs after the host writes; relative documentation links and whitespace checks passed. The report distinguishes native-host tool calls from model-generated conversations and ChatGPT client integration, which were not exercised.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-02T06:03:39.260327Z 6ce2630 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6ce2630730

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/README.md
| [Pilot plan](pilot.md) | Proposed evaluation, not completed customer research |

Live external ChatGPT/Codex assistant interactions and production disaster recovery remain unverified. Successful SDK fixtures, manual browser use, and local recovery exercises each establish only their own tested paths.
The native Codex MCP host and signed-in public browser workflow have live verification. ChatGPT's assistant connection, model-generated save/continue conversations and production disaster recovery remain unverified. Each report distinguishes host tool calls, SDK fixtures, browser use and local recovery exercises.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Update guides that still call Codex unverified

After declaring the native Codex host live-verified here, the current user and operations guides contradict this status: docs/getting-started.md:37 still says Codex host interactions remain unverified, while docs/sites.md:5 and docs/sites.md:7 say Codex behavior is unverified and no external assistant host has connected. Readers following those guides will receive obsolete compatibility guidance, so update them to distinguish the newly verified Codex tool-call path from the still-unverified ChatGPT and model-generated flows.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@agammann
agammann merged commit 0e836db into main Oct 2, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant