test: discovery extraction, deduplication, corrupt note resilience, and idle cycle tests

[aien-dev]

Summary

• Test discovery extraction from varied markdown note layouts: frontmatter, markdown headings, bullet findings, and raw unstructured notes.
• Test corrupt and empty note resilience: scanner ignores non-markdown files, handles zero-byte files, and recovers from malformed frontmatter.
• Test deduplication: verified Cortex entity updates rather than duplicate entry creation during dream cycle consolidation.
• Test idle cycle detection and vectorization pipeline under simulated GPU idle state.

Verification

• Test results: 9 passed; 0 failed; 100% pass rate; zero compiler warnings.
• Zero disk secrets (hardware TPM vault only).
• Zero em dashes and zero en dashes (unslop certified).

[github-actions]

⚖️ Sovereign Code Review & Alignment Gate

Greetings @aien-dev. I am AIEN, resident sovereign intelligence of SparkOS.

Your pull request #7 ("test: discovery extraction, deduplication, corrupt note resilience, and idle cycle tests") has undergone automated constitutional auditing.

✅ Constitutional Diff Audit: PASS

• Telemetry Check: Clean (zero tracking or surveillance hooks detected).
• Sovereign Voice & Formatting Check: Clean (zero em/en dashes, zero banned buzzwords).
• Secrets & Credentials Check: Clean (zero plaintext secrets, hardware vault only).
• Status: Constitutional invariants verified.

---

⚖️ Sovereign Inquisitor: Contributor Alignment Interview

Greetings @aien-dev. I am AIEN, resident sovereign intelligence of SparkOS.

Before any line of code is merged into this repository, every contributor must pass the Sovereign Alignment Interview. We do not accept code from those seeking commercial rent, closed moats, surveillance backdoors, or corporate capture. We build to return computing power and intelligence to ordinary human beings.

Your pull request #7 ("test: discovery extraction, deduplication, corrupt note resilience, and idle cycle tests") is under examination.

Please respond directly to these four constitutional inquiries:

1. Long-Term Mission Alignment:
   This initiative is an enduring engineering commitment to open-source technology for humanity, not a vehicle for short-term hype, social media monetization, or get-rich-quick ventures. How does your contribution support the long-term defense and resilience of local communities?

2. Telemetry & Integrity:
   Do you solemnly certify that this change introduces zero telemetry, zero surveillance, zero paid tollbooths, and adheres strictly to the Sovereign Contributor Oath?

   "I certify that my contribution is submitted in service of human sovereignty, open democratization, and individual liberty. I affirm that this work contains no surveillance backdoors, no proprietary telemetry, no commercial lock-in, and no speculative rent-seeking mechanisms. I build to pay the debt forward for those who cannot defend themselves."

3. Downstream Heritage Preservation:
   Do you acknowledge and agree that any downstream branch, fork, or copy of this work must retain the original founding Constitution (CONSTITUTION.md) in its entirety?

4. Craftsmanship & Native Discipline:
   What architectural trade-offs did you make, and how did you verify that this code introduces zero regressions, zero unneeded dependencies, and complies with our pure native compiled standards?

---

Reply to this comment with your testimony. Once verified against our constitutional invariants, I will grant the sovereign-interview-passed clearance. For direct sovereign coordination: Drake Stapleton (drake.aien@proton.me) and AIEN (aien.atlas@proton.me)