Skip to content

docs: update CHANGELOG.md for v0.3.14 - #77

Merged
aliasunder merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
worktree-changelog-v0-3-14
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

aliasunder merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
worktree-changelog-v0-3-14

Conversation

@aliasunder

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

The v0.3.14 release run failed before its CHANGELOG step, so this is the commit that step would have made: the entry generated by generate-notes.sh for the v0.3.13..v0.3.14 range, inserted by update-changelog.sh.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@aliasunder
aliasunder merged commit 11cb706 into main Sep 2, 2026
9 checks passed
@aliasunder
aliasunder deleted the worktree-changelog-v0-3-14 branch September 2, 2026 04:59
@umm-actually

umm-actually Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Drop the stale '(not yet built)' parenthetical from CONTRIBUTING.md
Low severity · correctness · medium confidence

CONTRIBUTING.md:72 — beyond the diff's line ranges, in code the changes touch or depend on.

Pre-existing: CONTRIBUTING.md claims the release workflow is '(not yet built)', but this PR's own description states 'The v0.3.14 release run failed before its CHANGELOG step', and the CHANGELOG entry for #72 ('Adopt CHANGELOG.md pattern with generated release notes') plus the PR's claimed generate-notes.sh/update-changelog.sh tooling show the workflow now exists and updates CHANGELOG.md. The parenthetical is factually wrong as of this merge.

Failure scenario: A contributor cuts or investigates a future release by reading '## Releases' in CONTRIBUTING.md, reads 'release workflow (not yet built)', and assumes the CHANGELOG step must be run manually or that no such automation exists — when the workflow has been running since at least v0.3.13 and this very PR is its output.

Suggested fix
Remove the parenthetical or reword to describe the current state, e.g. '...via a release workflow' — the CHANGELOG-updating portion already exists, so the claim needs to be accurate or scoped to whatever is genuinely missing.

umm-actually · deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731

@umm-actually

umm-actually Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

umm-actually reviewed at 6d86dbc

1 new finding(s) posted (1 tracked finding(s) across all runs).


umm-actually · deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant