For apisupport.ant, don't try to use the nbjdk.bootclasspath ant property, but rather take nbjdk.home, and take the JDK's bootstrap classpath.

[lahodaj]

If I open in a recent build a current source for e.g. <netbeans>/platform/openide.util, I'll get notices like:

Even though the source level of /home/jlahoda/src/nb/netbeans/platform/openide.util.lookup/src:/home/jlahoda/src/nb/netbeans/platform/openide.util.lookup/build/classes-generated is set to: 17, java.lang.AssertionError cannot be found on the bootclasspath: /usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar

in the log. Looking at the boot class path, that's not really surprising:

/usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar

there is obviously no rt.jar in the JDK 21 installation, so the search for j.l.AssertionError fails.

This PR tries to fix the apisupport projects boot and module boot path, based on the nbjdk.home property. It will create a (transient) Java platform if there's no Java platform with the given install directory.

---

^Add meaningful description above

Click to collapse/expand PR instructions

By opening a pull request you confirm that, unless explicitly stated otherwise, the changes -

• are all your own work, and you have the right to contribute them.
• are contributed solely under the terms and conditions of the Apache License 2.0 (see section 5 of the license for more information).

Please make sure (eg. git log) that all commits have a valid name and email address for you in the Author field.

If you're a first time contributor, see the Contributing guidelines for more information.

If you're a committer, please label the PR before pressing "Create pull request" so that the right test jobs can run.

PR approval and merge checklist:

1. Was this PR correctly labeled, did the right tests run? When did they run?
2. Is this PR squashed?
3. Are author name / email address correct? Are co-authors correctly listed? Do the commit messages need updates?
4. Does the PR title and description still fit after the Nth iteration? Is the description sufficient to appear in the release notes?

If this PR targets the delivery branch: don't merge. (full wiki article)

[mbien]

added ant label and restarting tests since apisupport.ant is part of the build tools job

[dbalek]

Looks fine.

[mbien]

@lahodaj could you rebase this PR? Probably something we could merge for NB31.

[lahodaj]

OK to merge?

[ebarboni]

LGTM was about merging it but just go