RATIS-2362. Use maven.compiler.release for target Java version

[adoroszlai]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Similar to apache/ratis-thirdparty#74.

• Replace maven.compiler.source with maven.compiler.release.
• Keep maven.compiler.target, but set it to the same as maven.compiler.release. This is required because Apache parent POM v35 uses .target as the source of truth.
• Remove custom java.min.version and maven.min.version properties, and maven-enforcer-plugin executions that reference these. Enforcement is inherited from Parent POM (properties, execution).
• Remove reference to non-existent property javac.source.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-2362

How was this patch tested?

Tested version enforcement with various Java and Maven versions.

Exactly minimum required versions:

$ mvn -V validate
Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
Java version: 1.8.0_462, vendor: Private Build, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
...
[INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-maven-version) @ ratis ---
[INFO] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireMavenVersion passed
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-java-version) @ ratis ---
[INFO] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireJavaVersion passed

Newer versions:

$ mvn -V validate
Apache Maven 3.9.11 (3e54c93a704957b63ee3494413a2b544fd3d825b)
Java version: 21.0.8, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk-amd64
...
[INFO] --- enforcer:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-maven-version) @ ratis ---
[INFO] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireMavenVersion passed
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- enforcer:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-java-version) @ ratis ---
[INFO] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireJavaVersion passed

Targeting Java 17:

$ mvn -V validate -Dmaven.compiler.release=17
Apache Maven 3.9.11 (3e54c93a704957b63ee3494413a2b544fd3d825b)
Java version: 21.0.8, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk-amd64
...
[INFO] --- enforcer:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-maven-version) @ ratis ---
[INFO] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireMavenVersion passed
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- enforcer:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-java-version) @ ratis ---
[INFO] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireJavaVersion passed

Maven too old:

$ mvn -V validate
Apache Maven 3.6.2 (40f52333136460af0dc0d7232c0dc0bcf0d9e117; 2019-08-27T17:06:16+02:00)
Java version: 1.8.0_462, vendor: Private Build, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
...
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-maven-version) on project ratis: The plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin:3.5.0 requires Maven version 3.6.3

Maven older than custom requirement:

$ mvn -V validate -DminimalMavenBuildVersion=3.9.0
Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
Java version: 21.0.8, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk-amd64
...
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-maven-version) on project ratis: 
[ERROR] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireMavenVersion failed with message:
[ERROR] Detected Maven Version: 3.6.3 is not in the allowed range [3.9.0,).

Java older than target:

$ mvn -V validate -Dmaven.compiler.release=17
Apache Maven 3.9.11 (3e54c93a704957b63ee3494413a2b544fd3d825b)
Java version: 1.8.0_462, vendor: Private Build, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
...
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin:3.5.0:enforce (enforce-java-version) on project ratis: 
[ERROR] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.version.RequireJavaVersion failed with message:
[ERROR] Detected JDK version 1.8.0-462 (JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre) is not in the allowed range [17,).

CI:
https://github.com/adoroszlai/ratis/actions/runs/19390640250

[adoroszlai]

@szetszwo please take a look

[szetszwo]

+1 the change looks good.

[adoroszlai]

Thanks @szetszwo for the review.