Enhancements to Longears Library for Extended Task Support #24
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear Aaron,
I hope this message finds you well. I'm writing from Munich, where I continue to enjoy working with your excellent longears library. In my recent projects, I've encountered a need to handle long-duration analysis tasks that exceed the current 60-second timeout limit.
To address this, I've introduced a heartbeat property to the amqp_connect function, which should help manage longer tasks without interruption. The modified code is included in the pull request for your review.
Additionally, while working with the library, I noticed a minor bug in consume.c related to the command sequence. I've made the necessary adjustments in this area as well.
Could you please take a look at these changes when you have a moment? If you agree with the modifications, I would be grateful if you could merge them into the main branch.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Markus