Skip to content

build(deps-dev): add jsdom as explicit devDependency - #1034

Merged
yogeshchoudhary147 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/jsdom-explicit-dep
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

yogeshchoudhary147 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/jsdom-explicit-dep

Conversation

@yogeshchoudhary147

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jsdom is an optional peer dep of vitest — not guaranteed to be installed when the lockfile is regenerated. Adding it explicitly fixes CI failures on dependabot PRs.

After this merges, comment @dependabot rebase on the open dependabot PRs to pick up the updated lockfile.

@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2026 06:00
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

⛔ Ignored keywords (3)
  • build(deps)
  • build(deps-dev)
  • chore(release)

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 29d93755-55f1-47d2-87e1-7266fbb0b970

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 merged commit d3886a9 into main Sep 11, 2026
12 of 13 checks passed
@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 deleted the fix/jsdom-explicit-dep branch September 11, 2026 07:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants