chore(release): 0.60.6 - #1341
Conversation
Signed-off-by: client-software-ci <129794699+client-software-ci@users.noreply.github.com>
| @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | |||
| ## 0.60.6 (2026-08-25) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 0.60.6 entry is added with no content and no blank line after the heading, so the top of the file now reads ## 0.60.6 (2026-08-25) immediately followed by ## 0.60.5 (2026-08-24) and then 0.60.5's ### Features section. Two things differ from every other entry in this file and from the generator template (.semantic_release/CHANGELOG.md.j2 emits the version heading followed by a blank line).
1. No blank line after the heading. Any tooling that extracts notes for the latest release by slicing between the first two level-2 headings gets an empty string, and a reader skimming the file sees 0.60.6 directly abutting 0.60.5's ### Features, which is easy to misread as belonging to 0.60.6.
2. No sections at all. The three commits between 0.60.5 and this release are test: (#1340), docs: (#1337), and chore(deps): (#1335) — none map to a ### Features or ### Bug Fixes heading under the template, which explains the empty body. But #1335 raises the openjd-model floor from >=0.11.2 to >=0.11.3, which is user-visible at install time: it can force a transitive upgrade for anyone pinning openjd-model, notably in the embedded-Python environments this library targets. Prior releases did document comparable dependency-floor changes as user-facing entries — 0.60.4's Constrained the MCP dependency to v1... and 0.60.3's The minimum click dependency has been raised to >= 8.3.3....
Worth confirming this is the intended shape of the release rather than a partially-generated entry, since publishing a version whose only changelog content is a bare heading gives consumers nothing to act on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we don't have any customer useful features, then I think its ok to just skip. :)
karthikbekalp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we don't have any customer useful features, then I think its ok to just skip. :)
| @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | |||
| ## 0.60.6 (2026-08-25) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we don't have any customer useful features, then I think its ok to just skip. :)
0.60.6 (2026-08-25)