Skip to content

feat: add KV package with dual provider support #351

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
jcbsfilho wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stage
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add KV package with dual provider support #351

jcbsfilho wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@jcbsfilho
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcbsfilho jcbsfilho commented Jan 21, 2026

  • Add new KV package with Redis-like client interface
  • Implement dual provider strategy (native and API)
  • Add automatic provider detection based on runtime environment
  • Implement core operations: get, getWithMetadata, set, delete
  • Add Redis-compatible methods: hSet, HSET, hGetAll, HGETALL, hVals, HVALS
  • Add support for metadata and expiration options
  • Export KV package in main package.json with CommonJS and ESM support

@jcbsfilho
feat: add KV package with dual provider support
7329a29 
- Add new KV package with Redis-like client interface
- Implement dual provider strategy (native and API)
- Add automatic provider detection based on runtime environment
- Implement core operations: get, getWithMetadata, set, delete
- Add Redis-compatible methods: hSet, HSET, hGetAll, HGETALL, hVals, HVALS
- Add support for metadata and expiration options
- Export KV package in main package.json with CommonJS and ESM support
@jcbsfilho jcbsfilho requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2026 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pablodiehl pablodiehl pablodiehl approved these changes

@PatrickMenoti PatrickMenoti PatrickMenoti approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jcbsfilho @pablodiehl @PatrickMenoti