Skip to content

Rewrite docs #81

Closed
Closed

Description

@sandstrom

Great gem! 💎

The current readme feels very AI-generated and is quite verbose. The signal to noise ratio isn't very high.

Some other thoughts:

  • Great that it supports generic use-cases (hotcell-core and client/server gems), and that the active storage stuff is layered on top.
  • The set of failure codes is pretty long, are all of them needed?
    • Maybe just let the hotcell return a JSON response instead? And reduce failure modes to those related to crashes etc.

Activity

  1. locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Sep 30, 2026
  2. converted this issue into a discussion #86 on Sep 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions