Skip to content

chore(shared): lock in 9 → 6 sweep copies, and withdraw a false extraction #35

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
github-actions merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

chore(shared): lock in 9 → 6 sweep copies, and withdraw a false extraction #35

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions SHARED.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -79,12 +79,12 @@ Ranked by (copies × how identical the logic is). Counts from

| Concern | Files | Why it is a good candidate |
|---|---|---|
| `auto-merge-sweep.sh` | **22** | 8 live versions of infrastructure that decides what ships. Highest count, worst drift. |
| rate limiting | **14** | A pure algorithm with zero app coupling. orangecat has 4, evig 3, botsmann 2 — *within one repo each*. |
| `auto-merge-sweep.sh` | ~~22~~ **6** | **EXTRACTED 2026-08-16/20.** Sixteen repos call the canonical as a reusable workflow, each verified to actually *run* it (a sweep that fails to start looks exactly like one with nothing to do). The six remaining are deliberate: dotfiles is the canonical home and runs it directly; ai-forms, datacat, petvity, solon had dirty working trees owned by other sessions when swept — convert when clear. The two repos that had ever *tested* their copies (evig, orangecat) had that coverage ported into the canonical suite **before** deletion: 17 cases, mutation-proven. |
| rate limiting | **14** | A pure algorithm with zero app coupling. orangecat has 4, evig 3, botsmann 2 — *within one repo each*. **The next extraction.** |
| AI provider client | **16** | evig 7, orangecat 5. `ai-ration` already owns the hard part (chain, 429, budget); these are the callers. |
| logger | **10** | sbb-lost-found alone has 4. |
| health route | **8** | Identical shape in 8 repos; a 20-line contract. |
| `@ai-native-cms/core` | 2 | evig and revampit vendor it with **byte-identical trees** (`675b864b…`). Not yet diverged, so it is the cheapest extraction available — and a clock that is running. |
| ~~`@ai-native-cms/core`~~ | — | **Withdrawn — measurement error.** `maonakamoto/revampit` *redirects* to `maonakamoto/evig` (renamed in the pivot); the "two repos" with byte-identical trees were two clones of ONE repo. Nothing to extract. Two directories are not two repos: check `git remote -v` before reporting cross-repo duplication. |

## What must NOT be centralized

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion scripts/ci/shared-inventory.baseline
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
automerge-script 9 9
automerge-script 6 6
rate-limit 9 14
email-send 6 7
logger 6 10
Expand Down