content(blog): DRAFT — "Gebaut, nicht gewollt" (evig platform vs Revamp-IT legacy) - #250
Merged
Conversation
…p-IT legacy stack (DRAFT, non-public) A comparison + roadmap post per George's request: makes clear evig's platform was built and Revamp-IT chose to stay on its legacy stack (Joomla + Shopware + Kivitendo/Perl, no API), lays out what was built and the roadmap (access to intelligence, robotics, financing models, open R&D). "Rejection stated cleanly": factual, respectful, wins on merit — NO personal/political attacks, no naming of individuals. Non-public by design: published:false + audience:author (super-admins only) + visibility:unlisted. To publish: flip to published:true / audience:public / visibility:public. DE only for now (translations follow once copy is approved). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…le upcycling E2E - Publish the evig-vs-legacy comparison post: published:true / audience:public / visibility:public, drop the draft banner. DE canonical + en/fr/es/it/ja/ko translations (title/excerpt translated, tables + image paths + brand/tech names preserved). - Fix red CI: drop the /projects/upcycling route #116 entries from the dual-persona E2E route matrix. Those pages were intentionally removed with the /projects purge (commit 10c1b8a) and now 404; the smoke test kept asserting them. (The upcycling CONFIG/assets are left intact — revive-or-retire is a separate call.) Verified: tsc clean, eslint clean on the E2E helper, all 7 post files valid frontmatter + published:true + tables + images. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
A draft blog post comparing the evig platform against Revamp-IT's legacy stack, per request. Non-public draft —
published: false+audience: author(super-admins only) +visibility: unlisted. It does not appear in the public blog, RSS, or listings, and merging this PR would not expose it. Review the prose here; to go live, flippublished: true/audience: public/visibility: public.Framing: "rejection, stated cleanly" (your pick)
revamp-it.ch) + Shopware + Kivitendo (Perl, no real API) — and that evig believes the automated path is better and goes it alone.Notes
/blog/showcase-revampit-*.png).die-revamp-it-plattform.md) telling the "three systems → one platform" story from the old framing; this new post is the sharper evig-voice comparison + roadmap. Decide whether both coexist or the old one is retired.Open decisions for you
🤖 Generated with Claude Code