README/Code Discrepancy: Features, Start-up, and Status Uncertainty
- The README claims you can
make up the project and try all architectural pieces, but various code directories and the multi-language stack (Go, Python, TypeScript, Shell) may not all be integrated or sufficiently complete.
- The dashboard, API, migrations, or sample agents might not be testable as described, or some services may be stub/placeholder only.
- This can confuse users and authors about what works today versus being aspirational or on the roadmap.
Key action items:
- Document the real status of each component in the README and/or dashboard, possibly with a feature/completeness matrix.
- Make sure quick start, usage, and limitations sections are up to date and aligned across docs and code.
- Tag unreleased or incomplete features appropriately.
Relates to parent: [META] Misalignment: README, Roadmap, and Repo Structure
README/Code Discrepancy: Features, Start-up, and Status Uncertainty
make upthe project and try all architectural pieces, but various code directories and the multi-language stack (Go, Python, TypeScript, Shell) may not all be integrated or sufficiently complete.Key action items:
Relates to parent: [META] Misalignment: README, Roadmap, and Repo Structure