Skip to content

[Repo Misalignment] Directory Structure Suggests Stability Not Matched By Code #9

Description

@bjl13

Repo File Structure vs Docs/Roadmap: Directory Content Ambiguity

  • The repo contains folders like agents/, internal/, and dashboard/ with mixed levels of code and documentation. Documentation claims they support certain objects, reference models, and minimal dashboard UI, but the actual implementation varies in stability and completeness.
  • Folder hierarchy and file names may give the impression of finished, production-grade modules. Some directories may contain placeholders, partial implementations, or prototypes only. The distinction is not always clear in structure or documentation.

What needs fixing:

  • Make folders and files self-documenting: Add README stubs to major directories explaining stability, readiness, or intended use (reference, example, alpha/beta).
  • Cross-link sections in the main README and roadmap to directory-level guidance on what to expect inside.
  • Periodically audit and clean up/relabel folders as code matures.

Relates to parent: [META] Misalignment: README, Roadmap, and Repo Structure

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions