feat: Review service unit tests - #22
Merged
Merged
Conversation
✅ Test Results - Booker API📊 Summary
🎉 Ready to merge! 📁 View Test Reports |
Mats057
reviewed
Mar 7, 2026
Mats057
requested changes
Mar 7, 2026
Mats057
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2026
…into feat/tests
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Criados os testes unitários para o service de Review
Também criei algumas fixtures para facilitar a criação de mocks para os testes. A ideia é criar automaticamente um objeto válido da entidade ou do DTO desejado, sem precisar poluir o teste com vários
.set()Futuramente podemos pensar em um builder para cada entidade, visando facilitar também a manipulação de objetos nos testes