Add OopsSec Store to a new Security section - #26
Open
kOaDT wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds OopsSec Store to the list, under a new
Securitysection.Why it belongs in awesome-nextjs
It is a security project, but the reason it is relevant here is that it is built on Next.js and teaches Next.js developers how their own apps break:
NEXT_PUBLIC_client-bundle trap, server components, middleware, and Prisma — not generic PHP-era examples.npx create-oss-store my-ctf-labordocker run -p 127.0.0.1:3000:3000 leogra/oss-oopssec-store.MIT licensed, actively maintained, listed in the OWASP Vulnerable Web Applications Directory.
Note on the new section
The app is intentionally vulnerable, so listing it under
E CommerceorAppnext to production-ready templates could mislead people into using it as a starter. A dedicatedSecuritysection makes the intent unambiguous and leaves room for future security-related entries. Happy to drop the section and move the entry underAppinstead if you prefer.